The Fayum primate forest: Did it exist?

The primates have the reputation of being essentially arboreal, forest-adapted animals. Yet there are many genera and species that inhabit an extremely wide array of non-forest habitats. Nevertheless, palaeoprimatologists often tend to depict fossil primate habitats as being more arboreal and more forest-like than is justified by the facts. It is worthwhile, therefore, to reconsider some current interpretations. In this paper, evidence of the Fayum Oligocene primate deposits are reviewed and discussed. The following conclusions emerge:(1) The large number of primate species indicates that the Fayum ecosystem was an optimum or near-optimum habitat for primates. (2) The lithological characteristics point to a sahélien type of climate. (3) The calcified and silicified root systems, having diameters up to 4 cm, suggest a sahélien type of shrub, bushland and/or small-tree vegetation. (4) The large fossilized logs cannot have grown on the spot and apparently represent driftwood from a more humid climatic belt in the south, as is indicated by damage resulting from fluvial transportation and by palaeobotanical data. (5) There may have been some minor patches or strips of medium-height forests and/or wood-lands in the Fayum delta, but there is no evidence of these.Thus the tall forest in which the earliest known African primates are currently supposed to have lived probably never existed. Grounds for this conclusion were presented by Unger 121 years ago, by Beadnell 75 years ago and by Kräusel 41 years ago, but sank into oblivion. The classic image of the primates as arboreal specialists seems to have interfered with seeing the facts. However, more extensive verification of the evidence by means of palaeobotanical research is still required. The fossil material to do so is readily available.