Landscape simplification weakens the association between terrestrial producer and consumer diversity in Europe |
| |
Authors: | Matteo Dainese Nick J B Isaac Gary D Powney Riccardo Bommarco Erik Öckinger Mikko Kuussaari Juha Pöyry Tim G Benton Doreen Gabriel Jenny A Hodgson William E Kunin Regina Lindborg Steven M Sait Lorenzo Marini |
| |
Institution: | 1. DAFNAE, University of Padova, Padova, Italy;2. Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;3. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Crowmarsh Gifford, UK;4. Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden;5. Natural Environment Centre, Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland;6. Faculty of Biological Sciences, School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK;7. Institute of Crop and Soil Science, Julius Kühn‐Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Braunschweig, Germany;8. Department of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK;9. Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden |
| |
Abstract: | Land‐use change is one of the primary drivers of species loss, yet little is known about its effect on other components of biodiversity that may be at risk. Here, we ask whether, and to what extent, landscape simplification, measured as the percentage of arable land in the landscape, disrupts the functional and phylogenetic association between primary producers and consumers. Across seven European regions, we inferred the potential associations (functional and phylogenetic) between host plants and butterflies in 561 seminatural grasslands. Local plant diversity showed a strong bottom‐up effect on butterfly diversity in the most complex landscapes, but this effect disappeared in simple landscapes. The functional associations between plant and butterflies are, therefore, the results of processes that act not only locally but are also dependent on the surrounding landscape context. Similarly, landscape simplification reduced the phylogenetic congruence among host plants and butterflies indicating that closely related butterflies become more generalist in the resources used. These processes occurred without any detectable change in species richness of plants or butterflies along the gradient of arable land. The structural properties of ecosystems are experiencing substantial erosion, with potentially pervasive effects on ecosystem functions and future evolutionary trajectories. Loss of interacting species might trigger cascading extinction events and reduce the stability of trophic interactions, as well as influence the longer term resilience of ecosystem functions. This underscores a growing realization that species richness is a crude and insensitive metric and that both functional and phylogenetic associations, measured across multiple trophic levels, are likely to provide additional and deeper insights into the resilience of ecosystems and the functions they provide. |
| |
Keywords: | coevolution ecosystem resilience functional traits habitat loss herbivory host specialization land‐use change phylogenetic diversity plant– insect interactions trophic associations |
|
|