首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Comparison of physicochemical properties of chitins isolated from an insect (Melolontha melolontha) and a crustacean species (Oniscus asellus)
Authors:Murat Kaya  Vykintas Baublys  Esra Can  Ingrida Šatkauskienė  Betül Bitim  Vaida Tubelytė  Talat Baran
Institution:1. Department of Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science and Letters, Aksaray University, 68100, Aksaray, Turkey
2. Science and Technology Application and Research Center, Aksaray University, 68100, Aksaray, Turkey
5. Department of Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, Science and Arts Faculty, Aksaray University, Aksaray, Turkey
3. Department of Biology, Vytautas Magnus University, 44404, Kaunas, Lithuania
4. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Letters, Aksaray University, Aksaray, Turkey
Abstract:The chitin structures of two common European species belonging to Insecta (Melolontha melolontha) and Crustacea (Oniscus asellus) were isolated. The same procedure is followed for chitin isolations for both the species. First, HCl was used for removing of minerals in the organisms, and then, the protein structure was removed by using NaOH. Chitins obtained from these two species were characterized physicochemically. Physicochemical properties of chitins isolated from the insect and the crustacean were compared to each other. The chitin content for dry weights of M. melolontha and O. asellus were recorded as 13–14 and 6–7 %, respectively. The results of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis and X-ray diffraction analysis were found to be more or less similar. The surface morphologies of chitins were examined via environmental scanning electron microscopy and nanofibers, and pore structures were observed. While the chitin nanofibers of O. asellus were adherent to each other, nanofibers of M. melolontha were non-adherent. On the other hand, the number of pores was much higher in the chitin from M. melolontha than in the chitin from O. asellus. Looking at the elemental analysis results, the M. melolontha chitin was found to be more pure than the O. asellus chitin. For this reason, M. melolontha has been considered more attractive source for chitin than O. asellus.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号