首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

着生藻类和浮游藻类在三峡库区河流健康评价中的适宜性比较研究
引用本文:刘园园,阿依巧丽,张森瑞,吴兴蓉,万彬娜,张小萍,曾波. 着生藻类和浮游藻类在三峡库区河流健康评价中的适宜性比较研究[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(11): 3833-3843
作者姓名:刘园园  阿依巧丽  张森瑞  吴兴蓉  万彬娜  张小萍  曾波
作者单位:三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室, 重庆市三峡库区植物生态与资源重点实验室, 西南大学生命科学学院, 重庆 400715
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0505301);科技部国家科技基础工作专项项目(2014FY120200);国务院三峡办三峡后续工作库区生态与生物多样性保护专项项目(5000002013BB5200001)
摘    要:藻类对水体环境变化敏感,其种类和数量与环境因素有密切联系并因环境的变化而发生变化,因此藻类常作为河流健康评价的指示生物。水体中的藻类根据生活习性不同分为着生藻类和浮游藻类,在河流健康评价中,以往的工作中有的采用浮游藻类用于河流健康评价,有的采用着生藻类用于评价,但浮游藻类和着生藻类究竟何者用于河流健康评价更适宜,抑或是二者在用于评价的适宜性上没有明显差别,迄今为止未开展过深入研究。选择三峡库区内的两条河流嘉陵江和乌江作为研究对象,于2015年9月,在两条河流上共布设11个研究断面,对嘉陵江、乌江的水环境理化因子、着生藻类和浮游藻类群落进行调查研究,应用着生藻类生物完整性指数(Periphytic algal index of biological integrity,Pe-IBI)和浮游藻类生物完整性指数(Phytoplankton index of biological integrity,Ph-IBI),并结合水体综合污染指数(Comprehensive pollution index,CPI),对嘉陵江、乌江的健康状况进行评价。研究结果表明,采用着生藻类生物完整性评价(Pe-IB...

关 键 词:着生藻类  浮游藻类  河流健康评价  生物完整性指数  综合污染指数  嘉陵江  乌江
收稿时间:2018-12-06
修稿时间:2020-05-11

Comparative study on the suitability of periphytic algae and phytoplankton in river health assessment
LIU Yuanyuan,AYI Qiaoli,ZHANG Senrui,WU Xingrong,WAN Binn,ZHANG Xiaoping,ZENG Bo. Comparative study on the suitability of periphytic algae and phytoplankton in river health assessment[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(11): 3833-3843
Authors:LIU Yuanyuan  AYI Qiaoli  ZHANG Senrui  WU Xingrong  WAN Binn  ZHANG Xiaoping  ZENG Bo
Affiliation:Key Laboratory of Eco-environments in Three Gorges Reservoir Region(Ministry of Education), Chongqing Key Laboratory of Plant Ecology and Resources in Three Gorges Reservoir Region, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
Abstract:Algae are sensitive to the changes of water environment. The species composition and individual quantity of algae are closely related to the living environments and change with environmental variation. Therefore, algae are usually used as an indicator to assess river health. Aquatic algae can be divided into periphytic algae and phytoplankton according to their inhabiting behaviors. In previous studies, some researchers applied phytoplankton in river health assessment, but some other researchers applied periphytic algae in river health assessment. However, as regards which of periphytic algae and phytoplankton is more suitable in river health assessment, or whether no significant difference exists in the suitability of periphytic algae and phytoplankton in river health assessment, very few studies have been reported so far. In this study, taking Jialing River and Wujiang River as the subject, 11 sections in total were set in these two rivers, and the physi-chemical characteristics of water environment and the periphytic algal and phytoplankton communities at 11 sections were investigated in September, 2015. By using periphytic algal index of biological integrity (Pe-IBI) and phytoplankton index of biological integrity (Ph-IBI), together with comprehensive pollution index (CPI), the health status of Jialing River and Wujiang River were assessed. It was shown in this study that seven core parameters including total algal taxa number, Cyanophyta taxa number, Chlorophyta taxa number, individual proportion of Nitzschia, individual proportion of dominant taxa, Shannon-Wiener''s diversity index, and evenness index, could be screened when the Pe-IBI was applied in the health assessment of Jialing River and Wujiang River. The negative correlations of Pe-IBI to CPI, total nitrogen content, and lead content of river water were found, which means that the biological integrity of periphytic algae decreased with the deterioration of water environment. However, when the Ph-IBI was applied in the health assessment of Jialing River and Wujiang River, only one core parameter (algae density) could be screened. Moreover, no correlation of Ph-IBI to comprehensive pollution index or to any of twelve water environmental factors was found. Our study revealed that, for rivers, periphytic algae is better than phytoplankton to indicate the water environmental quality, and consequently, periphytic algae is more suitable than phytoplankton to be used in river health assessment.
Keywords:periphytic algae  phytoplankton  river health assessment  biotic integrity index  comprehensive pollution index  Jialing River  Wujiang River
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生态学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号