首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Endocytosis: Past,Present, and Future
Authors:Sandra L Schmid  Alexander Sorkin  Marino Zerial
Institution:1.Department of Cell Biology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390;2.Department of Cell Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261;3.Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, 01307 Dresden, Germany
Abstract:Endocytosis may have been a driving force behind the evolution of eukaryotic cells. It plays critical roles in cell biology (e.g., signal transduction) and in organismal physiology (e.g., tissue morphogenesis).Endocytosis, the process of cellular ingestion, may have been the driving force behind evolution of the eucaryotic cell (de Duve 2007). Acquiring the ability to internalize macromolecules and digest them intracellularly would have allowed primordial cells to move out from their food sources and pursue a predatory existence; one that might have led to the development of endosymbiotic relationships with mitochondria and plastids. Thus, it is fitting that endocytosis was first discovered and named as the processes of cell “eating” and “drinking.” In 1883, the developmental biologist Ilya Metchnikoff coined the term phagocytosis, from the Greek “phagos” (to eat) and “cyte” (cell), after observing motile cells in transparent starfish larva surround and engulf small splinters that he had inserted (Tauber 2003). Decades later, in 1931, Warren H. Lewis, one of the earliest cell “cinematographers” coined the term pinocytosis, from the Greek “pinean” (to drink), after observing the uptake of surrounding media into large vesicles in cultured macrophages, sarcoma cells, and fibroblasts by time-lapse imaging (Lewis 1931; Corner 1967).Importantly, these pioneering studies also revealed that the function of endocytosis goes well beyond eating and drinking. Indeed, Metchnikoff, considered one of the founders of modern immunology, realized that the phagocytic behavior of the mesodermal amoeboid cells he had observed under the microscope could serve as a general defense system against invasive parasites, in the larva as in man. This revolutionary concept, termed the phagocytic theory, earned Metchnikoff the 1908 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his work on phagocytic immunity, which he shared with Paul Ehrlich who discovered the complementary mechanisms of humoral immunity that led to the identification of antibodies (Vaughan 1965; Tauber 2003; Schmalstieg and Goldman 2008). The phagocytic theory was a milestone in immunology and cell biology, and formally gave birth to the field of endocytosis.Key discoveries over the intervening years, aided in large part by the advent of electron microscopy, revealed multiple pathways for endocytosis in mammalian cells that fulfill multiple critical cellular functions (Fig. 1). These mechanistically and morphologically distinct pathways, and their discoverers, include clathrin-mediated endocytosis (Roth and Porter 1964), caveolae uptake (Palade 1953; Yamada 1955), cholesterol-sensitive clathrin- and caveolae-independent pathways (Moya et al. 1985; Hansen et al. 1991; Lamaze et al. 2001), and, more recently, the large capacity CLIC/GEEC pathway (Kirkham et al. 2005). In place of Metchnikoff’s splinters, many of these discoveries resulted from the detection and tracking of internalized HRP-, ferritin-, or gold-conjugated ligands by electron microscopy. These electron-dense tracers allowed researchers to identify cellular structures associated with the uptake and intracellular sorting of receptor-bound ligands. A particularly striking example is the pioneering work of Roth and Porter, who in 1964 observed the uptake of yolk proteins into mosquito oocytes. To synchronize uptake, they killed female mosquitos at timed intervals after a blood feed and observed the sequential appearance of electron-dense yolk granules in coated pits, coated and uncoated vesicles, and progressively larger vesicles. Their remarkable observations accurately described coated vesicle budding, uncoating, homo- and heterotypic fusion events, as well as the emergence of tubules from early endosomes (Fig. 2), all of which are now known hallmarks of the early endocytic trafficking events.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Time line for discoveries of endocytic pathways and their discoverers. Boxes are color-coded by pathway. *, Nobel laureate. HRP, horseradish peroxidase; CCVs, clathrin-coated vesicles; CCPs, clathrin-coated pits; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; PM, plasma membrane; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; CLIC/GEEC, clathrin-independent carriers/GPI-enriched endocytic compartments.Open in a separate windowFigure 2.Fiftieth anniversary of the discovery of clathrin-mediated endocytosis by Roth and Porter (1964). The image is the hand-drawn summary of observations made by electron microscopic examination of the trafficking of yolk proteins in a mosquito oocyte. Note the many details, later confirmed and mechanistically studied over the intervening 50 years. These include the growth, invagination, and pinching off of coated pits (1,2), which concentrate cargo taken up by coated vesicles (3), the rapid uncoating of nascent-coated vesicles (4), homotypic fusion of nascent endocytic vesicles in the cell periphery (5), the formation of tubules from early endosomes (7), and changes in the intraluminal properties of larger endosomes (6). Finally, yolk proteins are stored in granules as crystalline bodies (8). (From Roth and Porter 1964; reprinted, with express permission, from Rockefeller University Press © 1964, The Journal of Cell Biology 20: 313–332, doi: 10.1083/jcb.20.2.313.)Another milestone in the field of endocytosis was the discovery of the lysosome by Christian de Duve (Appelmans et al. 1955). Whereas the finding of phagocytosis and other endocytic pathways was possible through microscopy, the discovery of lysosomes originated from a biochemical approach (Courtoy 2007), which benefited from the invention of the ultracentrifuge. de Duve and coworkers observed that preparations of acid phosphatase obtained by subcellular fractionation had an unusual behavior: contrary to most enzymatic activities, the activity of acid phosphatase increased rather than decreased with time, freezing–thawing of the fractions and the presence of detergents. Interestingly, the same was true for other hydrolases, which depended on acidic pH for their optimal activity. This led him to postulate that the acid hydrolases were contained in acidified membrane-bound vesicles. In collaboration with Alex Novikoff, he visualized these vesicles, the lysosomes, by electron microscopy (Beaufay et al. 1956) and later showed their content of acid phosphatase (Farquhar et al. 1972). In 1974, de Duve was awarded the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine for his seminal finding of the lysosomes and peroxisomes. He shared it with Albert Claude and George E. Palade “for their discoveries concerning the structural and functional organization of the cell.” The importance of this work lies also in the significant therapeutic applications that followed. The discovery by Elizabeth Neufeld and collaborators of uptake of lysosomal enzymes by cells provided the foundation for enzyme replacement therapy for lysosomal storage disorders (Neufeld 2011).In the 1970s, research in endocytosis entered the molecular era. Using de Duve and Albert Claude-like methods of subcellular fractionation, Barbara M. Pearse purified clathrin-coated vesicles from pig brain (Pearse 1975). A year later, she isolated a major protein species of 180 kDa, which she named clathrin “to indicate the lattice-like structures which it forms” (Pearse 1976). It was a breakthrough that inaugurated the molecular dissection of clathrin-mediated endocytosis.Over the intervening years, the continued application of microscopy (which now spans from electron cryotomography to live cell, high-resolution fluorescence microscopy), genetics (in particular, in yeast, Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster), biochemistry (including cell-free reconstitution of endocytic membrane trafficking events), as well as molecular and structural biology have revealed a great deal about the cellular machineries and mechanisms that govern trafficking along the endocytic pathway. A partial, and because of space limitations, necessarily incomplete list of milestones (
YearMechanistic milestonesDiscoverers
1973Identification of shibirets (dynamin) mutant in DrosophilaD. Suzuki and C. Poodry
1974–1976Zipper mechanism for phagocytosisS. Silverstein
1975–1976Isolation of CCVs, purification of clathrinB. Pearse
1982–1984Phosphomannose, M6PR, and lysosomal targetingW. Sly, S. Kornfeld, E. Neufeld, G. Sahagian
1983–1984Isolation of clathrin adapters/localization to distinct membranesJ. Keen, B. Pearse, M. Robinson
1986Isolation of endocytosis mutants (End) in yeastH. Riezman
1986–1987Isolation of vacuolar protein sorting mutants in yeastS. Emr, T. Stevens
1986Endosome fusion in vitroJ. Gruenberg and K. Howell
1986EGF and insulin receptor signaling from endosomesJ. Bergeron and B. Posner
1986Macropinocytosis induced in stimulated cellsD. Bar-Sagi and J. Feramisco
1987Endocytic sorting motifs (FxNPxY, YxxF)M. Brown and J. Goldstein, I. Trowbridge, T. McGraw
1987–1989Cloning of CHC, CLC, AP2T. Kirchhausen, M. Robinson
1988Isolation of biochemically distinct early and late endosomesS. Schmid and I. Mellman
1989–1991Clathrin-mediated endocytosis reconstituted in vitroE. Smythe, G. Warren, S. Schmid
1990Localization of endosomal Rab5 and Rab7P. Chavrier, R. Parton, M. Zerial
1991Endosome to trans-Golgi network (TGN) transport reconstituted in vitroS. Pfeffer
1992Rab5 and Rab4 as early endocytic regulators in vivoM. Zerial, R. Parton, I. Mellman
1992–1995Caveolin/VIP21 identified as caveolar coat proteinR. Anderson, T. Kurzchalia, R. Parton, K. Simons
1992Vacuolar fusion reconstituted in vitroW. Wickner
1992–1994Trigger mechanism for phagocytosis of bacteriaS. Falkow, J. Galán, J. Swanson
1993Actin’s role in endocytosis in yeastH. Riezman
1993Isolation of autophagy mutants (Atg) in yeastY. Ohsumi
1993PI3 kinase activity (PI3P) and endosome functionS. Emr
1993Dynamin’s role in clathrin-mediated endocytosisR. Vallee, S. Schmid
1995Dynamin assembles into ringsS. Schmid, P. De Camilli
1996Clathrin-mediated endocytosis requirement for signalingS. Schmid
1996Long distance retrograde transport of signaling endosomes in neuronsW. Mobley
1996PI5 phosphatase activity (PI(4,5)P2) and clathrin-mediated endocytosisP. De Camilli
1996Ubiquitin-dependent sorting in endocytosisR. Haguenauer-Tsapis; L. Hicke and H. Riezman
1997AP3 and endosomal/lysosomal sortingJ. Bonifacino, S. Robinson
1998FYVE fingers bind to PI3PH. Stenmark
1998LBPA in MVB biogenesisT. Kobayashi, R. Parton, J. Gruenberg
1997–1998Sorting nexinsG. Gill, S. Emr
1998Structural basis for Y-based sorting signal recognitionD. Owen
1998Retromer coat and endosome to TGN sortingS. Emr
1998β-Propeller structure of clathrin heavy chain terminal domainT. Kirchhausen and S. Harrison
1998Cargo-specific subpopulations of clathrin-coated pitsM. von Zastrow
1999Structure of the clathrin coat protein superhelical motifsJ. Ybe and F. Brodsky
1999Imaging green fluorescent protein–clathrin in living cellsJ. Keen
1999Biochemical purification of Rab5 effectorsS. Christoforidis and M. Zerial
1999Genetic screen for endocytosis mutants in C. elegansB. Grant
2000Role of endocytosis in establishing morphogenic gradientsM. Gonzalez-Gaitan, S.M. Cohen
2000Identification of GGA coats and lysosomal sortingJ. Bonifacino, S. Kornfeld, M. Robinson
2000Identification of endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) machinery for multivesicular body (MVB) formationS. Emr
2001Ubiquitin-dependent sorting into MVBsR. Piper, S. Emr, H. Pelham
2002Structure of the AP2 coreD. Owen
2003Lipid conjugation of LC3/Atg8Y. Ohsumi
2003–2004siRNA studies of endocytic componentsS. Robinson, E. Ungewickell, A. Sorkin
2004BAR domains and membrane curvature generationH. McMahon, P. De Camilli
20048-Å structure of a complete clathrin coatT. Kirchhausen and S. Harrison
2005Modular design of yeast endocytosis machineryD. Drubin and M. Kaksonen
2005Kinome-wide RNAi analysis of clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) and clathrin-independent endocytosis (CIE)M. Zerial and L. Pelkmans
2006–2008Reconstitution of dynamin-mediated membrane fissionA. Roux, P. De Camilli, S. Schmid, J. Zimmerberg, V. Frolov
2007Glycosphingolipid-induced endocytosisL. Johannes
2009Reconstitution of Rab- and SNARE-dependent vacuolar and endosome fusion from purified componentsW. Wickner, M. Zerial
2010Cavins as major caveolae coat componentsR. Parton; B. Nichols
2010Reconstitution of ESCRT-dependent internal vesicle formationT. Wollert and J. Hurley
2012Reconstitution of CCV formation from minimal componentsE. Ungewickell
Open in a separate window
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号