A Framework for the Economic Analysis of Data Collection Methods for Vital Statistics |
| |
Authors: | Eliana Jimenez-Soto Andrew Hodge Kim-Huong Nguyen Zoe Dettrick Alan D. Lopez |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Australia.; 2. Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine, Griffith University, Australia.; 3. School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia.; US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, United States of America, |
| |
Abstract: | BackgroundOver recent years there has been a strong movement towards the improvement of vital statistics and other types of health data that inform evidence-based policies. Collecting such data is not cost free. To date there is no systematic framework to guide investment decisions on methods of data collection for vital statistics or health information in general. We developed a framework to systematically assess the comparative costs and outcomes/benefits of the various data methods for collecting vital statistics.MethodologyThe proposed framework is four-pronged and utilises two major economic approaches to systematically assess the available data collection methods: cost-effectiveness analysis and efficiency analysis. We built a stylised example of a hypothetical low-income country to perform a simulation exercise in order to illustrate an application of the framework.FindingsUsing simulated data, the results from the stylised example show that the rankings of the data collection methods are not affected by the use of either cost-effectiveness or efficiency analysis. However, the rankings are affected by how quantities are measured.ConclusionThere have been several calls for global improvements in collecting useable data, including vital statistics, from health information systems to inform public health policies. Ours is the first study that proposes a systematic framework to assist countries undertake an economic evaluation of DCMs. Despite numerous challenges, we demonstrate that a systematic assessment of outputs and costs of DCMs is not only necessary, but also feasible. The proposed framework is general enough to be easily extended to other areas of health information. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|