首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Important Plant Areas: revised selection criteria for a global approach to plant conservation
Authors:Iain Darbyshire  Seona Anderson  Anna Asatryan  Andrew Byfield  Martin Cheek  Colin Clubbe  Zeineb Ghrabi  Timothy Harris  Charlie D. Heatubun  James Kalema  Sékou Magassouba  Ben McCarthy  William Milliken  Bertrand de Montmollin  Eimear Nic Lughadha  Jean-Michel Onana  Doumbouya Saïdou  Anca Sârbu  Krishna Shrestha  Elizabeth A. Radford
Affiliation:1.Royal Botanic Gardens,Richmond,UK;2.Plantlife International,Salisbury,UK;3.Institute of Botany of the National Academy of Sciences of Armenia,Yerevan,Armenia;4.Institut National Agronomique de Tunisie (INAT),Tunis,Tunisia;5.University College London,London,UK;6.Faculty of Forestry and Center for Biodiversity Research,Universitas Papua,Manokwari,Indonesia;7.Makerere University Herbarium, College of Natural Sciences,Makerere University,Kampala,Uganda;8.Herbier National de Guinée,Université Gamal Abdel de Conakry,Conakry,Guinea;9.IUCN/SSC Mediterranean Plant Specialist Group (MPSG),Neuchatel,Switzerland;10.Département de Biologie et Physiologie Végétales, Faculté des Sciences,Université de Yaoundé I,Yaoundé,Cameroon;11.Ministre de l’Environnement des Eaux et Forêts, Republic de Guinée,Conakry,Guinea;12.Facultatea de Biologie,Universitatea din Bucure?ti,Bucharest,Romania;13.Ethnobotanical Society of Nepal (ESON),Kathmandu,Nepal;14.Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB),International Directorate,Sandy,UK
Abstract:Despite the severe threats to plant habitats and high levels of extinction risk for plant species in many parts of the world, plant conservation priorities are often poorly represented in national and global frameworks because of a lack of data in an accessible and consistent format to inform conservation decision making. The Important Plant Areas (IPAs) criteria system offers a pragmatic yet scientifically rigorous means of delivering these datasets, enabling informed national- or regional-scale conservation prioritisation, and contributing significantly towards global prioritisation systems including the International Union for Conservation of Nature Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) Standard. In this paper, we review the IPA rationale and progress on IPA identification to date, including the perceived limitations of the process and how these may be overcome. We then present a revised set of criteria for use globally, developed through the combined experiences of IPA identification over the past decade and a half and through a recent global consultation process. An overview of how the revised IPA criteria can work alongside the newly published KBA Standard is also provided. IPA criteria are based around a sound, scientific, global framework which acknowledges the practical problems of gathering plant and habitat data in many regions of the world, and recognises the role of peer reviewed expert opinion in the selection process. National and sub-national engagement in IPA identification is essential, providing a primary route towards long term conservation of key sites for plant diversity. The IPA criteria can be applied to the conservation of all organism groups within the plant and fungal kingdoms.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号