Male genetic quality and the inequality between paternity success and fertilization success: consequences for studies of sperm competition and the evolution of polyandry

Studies of postcopulatory sexual selection typically estimate a male's fertilization success from his paternity success ( P ₂) calculated at hatching or birth. However, P ₂ may be affected by differential embryo viability, thereby confounding estimations of true fertilization success ( F ₂). This study examines the effects of variation in the ability of males to influence embryo viability upon the inequality between P ₂ and F ₂. It also investigates the consequences of this inequality for testing the hypothesis that polyandrous females accrue viability benefits for their offspring through facilitation of sperm competition (good-sperm model). Simulations of competitive mating trials show that although relative measures of male reproductive success tend to underestimate the strength of underlying good-sperm processes, good-sperm processes can be seriously overestimated using P ₂ values if males influence the viability of the embryos they sire. This study cautions the interpretation of P ₂ values as a proxy for fertilization success or sperm competitiveness in studies of postcopulatory sexual selection, and highlights that the good-sperm hypothesis needs empirical support from studies able to identify and separate unequivocally the males' ability to win fertilizations from their ability to influence the development of embryos.