首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Archaeological Analysis Does Not Support Intentionality in the Production of Brushed Ends on Chimpanzee Termiting Tools
Authors:Jason L. Heaton  Travis Rayne Pickering
Affiliation:(1) Department of Biology, Samford University, 800 Lakeshore Drive, Birmingham, Alabama 35229, USA;(2) Stone Age Institute, 1392 West Dittemore Road, Gosport (Bloomington), Indiana 47433, USA;(3) Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1180 Observatory Drive, 5240 Social Science Building, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA;(4) Institute of Human Evolution, University of the Witwatersrand, WITS 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa
Abstract:Some chimpanzees use 2 types of tools to extract underground termites for consumption. Chimpanzees insert thin, flexible probes into tunnels or holes in termite mounds (fishing), and sometimes use stouter, rigid sticks to first puncture the holes and also possibly to fish. Many puncturing sticks have distinctive “brushed” ends. Researchers have hypothesized that chimpanzees create the brushed ends intentionally to increase their affixibility to biting termites (Sugiyama, 1985). The results of our archaeological analysis of a large collection of puncturing sticks used by Central African chimpanzees falsifies this hypothesis, and instead agrees with the recent behavioral observations of Sanz et al. (2004; cf. Bermejo and Illera, 1999) that brushing is a coincidental result of procuring sticks from vegetation sources. The results highlight the positive contribution of an archaeological approach to problems in chimpanzee material culture and emphasize to primatologists the value of curating artifacts.
Keywords:archaeological approach  artifacts  Central Africa  chimpanzees  extractive foraging
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号