首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Contemporary genetic structure of an endemic freshwater turtle reflects Miocene orogenesis of New Guinea
Authors:Arthur Georges  Xiuwen Zhang  Peter Unmack  Brenden N Reid  Minh Le  William P McCord
Institution:1. Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, , Canberra, ACT, 2601 Australia;2. Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin, , Madison, WI, 53706 USA;3. Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Hanoi University of Science, , Hanoi, Vietnam;4. Centre for Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, , Hanoi, Vietnam;5. Department of Herpetology, American Museum of Natural History, , New York, NY, 10024 USA;6. East Fishkill Animal Hospital, , Hopewell Junction, NY, 12533 USA
Abstract:The island of New Guinea lies in one of the most tectonically active regions in the world and has long provided outstanding opportunity for studies of biogeography. Several chelid turtles, of clear Gondwanal origin, occur in New Guinea; all species except one, the endemic Elseya novaeguineae, are restricted to the lowlands south of the Central Ranges. Elseya novaeguineae is found throughout New Guinea. We use mitochondrial and nuclear gene variation among populations of E. novaeguineae throughout its range to test hypotheses of recent extensive dispersal versus more ancient persistence in New Guinea. Its genetic structure bears the signature of Miocene vicariance events. The date of the divergence between a Birds Head (Kepala Burung) clade and clades north and south of the Central Ranges is estimated to be 19.8 Mya 95% highest posterior density (HPD) interval of 13.3–26.8 Mya] and the date between the northern and southern clades is estimated to be slightly more recent at 17.4 Mya (95% HPD interval of 11.0–24.5 Mya). The distribution of this endemic species is best explained by persistent occupation (or early invasion and dispersal) and subsequent isolation initiated by the dramatic landform changes that were part of the Miocene history of the island of New Guinea, rather than as a response to the contemporary landscape of an exceptionally effective disperser. The driving influence on genetic structure appears to have been isolation arising from a combination of: (1) the early uplift of the Central Ranges and establishment of a north‐south drainage divide; (2) development of the Langguru Fold Belt; (3) the opening of Cenderawasih Bay; and (4) the deep waters of the Aru Trough and Cenderawasih Bay that come close to the current coastline to maintain isolation of the Birds Head through periods of sea level minima (?135 m). The dates of divergence of turtle populations north and south of the ranges predate the telescopic uplift of the central ranges associated with oblique subduction of the Australian Plate beneath the Pacific Plate. Their isolation was probably associated with earlier uplift and drainage isolation driven by the accretion of island terranes to the northern boundary of the Australian craton that occurred earlier than the oblique subduction. The opening of Cenderawasih Bay is too recent (6 Mya) to have initiated the isolation of the Birds Head populations from those of the remainder of New Guinea, although its deep waters will have served to sustain the isolation through successive sea level changes. The molecular evidence suggests that the Birds Head docked with New Guinea some time before the Central Ranges emerged as a barrier to turtle dispersal. Overall, deep genetic structure of the species complex reflects events and processes that occurred during Miocene, whereas structure within each clade across the New Guinea landscape relates to Pliocene and Pleistocene times. © 2013 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2014, 111 , 192–208.
Keywords:Birds Head  Chelidae  Elseya novaeguineae  Indonesia  Langguru Fold Belt  molecular clock  Papua  tectonics  Vogelkop
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号