首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Analytical validation of a prognostic prostate cancer gene expression assay using formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue
Authors:Paul Wallace Medlow  Christopher James Steele  Andrena Marie McCavigan  Wesley Reardon  Christopher Michael Brown  Shauna May Lambe  Felipe Augusto Andre Ishiy  Steven Michael Walker  Gemma Elizabeth Logan  Olaide Yaqeen Raji  Viktor Berge  Betina Katz  Elaine Williamson Kay  Katherine Sheehan  Ronald William Watson  Denis Paul Harkin  Richard Darragh Kennedy  Laura Anne Knight
Institution:1.Almac Diagnostics Ltd.,Craigavon,UK;2.Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology,Queens University Belfast,Belfast,UK;3.Department of Urology,Oslo University Hospital,Oslo,Norway;4.Department of Pathology,Oslo University Hospital,Oslo,Norway;5.Department of Pathology, RCSI,Beaumont Hospital,Dublin,Ireland;6.UCD School of Medicine, Conway Institute,University College Dublin,Dublin,Ireland
Abstract:

Background

There is a clear need for assays that can predict the risk of metastatic prostate cancer following curative procedures. Importantly these assays must be analytically robust in order to provide quality data for important clinical decisions. DNA microarray based gene expression assays measure several analytes simultaneously and can present specific challenges to analytical validation. This study describes the analytical validation of one such assay designed to predict metastatic recurrence in prostate cancer using primary formalin fixed paraffin embedded tumour material.

Methods

Accuracy was evaluated with a method comparison study between the assay development platform (Prostate Disease Specific Array) and an alternative platform (Xcel? microarray) using 50 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded prostate cancer patient samples. An additional 70 samples were used to establish the assay reportable range. Determination of assay precision and sensitivity was performed on multiple technical replicates of three prostate cancer samples across multiple variables (operators, days, runs, reagent lots, and equipment) and RNA/cDNA inputs respectively using the appropriate linear mixed model.

Results

The overall agreement between the development and alternative platform was 94.7% (95% confidence interval, 86.9–98.5%). The reportable range was determined to be 0.150 to 1.107 for core needle biopsy samples and???0.214 to 0.844 for radical prostatectomy samples. From the precision study, the standard deviations for assay repeatability and reproducibility were 0.032 and 0.040 respectively. The sensitivity study demonstrated that a total RNA input and cDNA input of 50?ng and 3.5?μg respectively was conservative.

Conclusion

The Metastatic Assay was found to be highly reproducible and precise. In conclusion the studies demonstrated an acceptable analytical performance for the assay and support its potential use in the clinic.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号