Predicting group size in primates: foraging costs and predation risks

We present a direct test of the long-standing hypothesis thatfood competition limits primate group size. Group size is acritical social variable because it constrains most other aspectsof social organization. We develop a simple population-specificindex of indirect feeding competition based on daily foragingcosts. This index explains nearly two-thirds of between-populationvariation in mean group sizes of mostly fruit-eating (but notof mostly leaf-eating) primates. Group size is also significantlyrelated to body size and terrestriality (or use of open country),which are suspected correlates of predation risk, although feedingcompetition remains an important predictor of group size evenwhen these correlates are controlled. Phylogeny also appearsto be important: the differences between observed mean populationgroup sizes and those predicted using ecological factors aremost positive for the Old World monkeys and most negative forthe lemuroids in our sample. The weak relationship between groupsize and feeding competition found for folivorous species maybe explained either by the energetic constraints of a leafydiet or by limits to group size imposed by infanticide as ahabitual male reproductive strategy.