首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Multicenter evaluation of prototype real‐time PCR assays for Epstein‐Barr virus and cytomegalovirus DNA in whole blood samples from transplant recipients
Authors:Yoshinori Ito  Shunji Takakura  Satoshi Ichiyama  Mitsuharu Ueda  Yukio Ando  Kazuyuki Matsuda  Eiko Hidaka  Kaname Nakatani  Junji Nishioka  Tsutomu Nobori  Naoki Kajiyama  Hiroshi Kimura
Institution:1. Pediatrics;2. Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606‐8501;3. Department of Diagnostic Medicine, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kumamoto 860‐8556;4. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto 390‐8621;5. Department of Molecular and Laboratory Medicine, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu 514‐8507;6. Roche Diagnostics K.K., Tokyo 105‐0014, Japan;7. Virology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 466‐8550
Abstract:Quantitative PCR is becoming widespread for diagnosing and monitoring post‐transplantation diseases associated with EBV and CMV. These assays need to be standardized to manage patients in different facilities. Five independent laboratories in Japan compared home‐brew assays and a prototype assay system to establish a standard quantitative procedure for measuring EBV and CMV. Reference standards and a total of 816 (642 EBV and 174 CMV) whole blood samples from post‐transplantation recipients were used for this multicenter evaluation. The prototype reference standard for EBV was compared to a panel of samples, with a theoretical expected value made using EBV‐positive cells containing two virus genome copies per cell. The mean ratio of the reference standard at each site to the standard of the prototype assay was ≤4.15 for EBV among three different sites and ≤3.0 for CMV between two laboratories. The mean of the theoretical expected number of the EBV genome: prototype reference was close to 1.0. The correlation coefficients between the viral copy numbers determined using the prototype assay and those using each home‐brew assay were high (EBV, 0.73–0.83, median = 0.78; CMV, 0.54–0.60, median = 0.57). The dynamics of the EBV and CMV loads in transplant recipients were similar between the assay types. There was an inter‐laboratory difference among the quantification results, indicating that a unified protocol and kit are favorable for standardizing the quantification of EBV and CMV. Such standardization will help to standardize the diagnosis and monitoring of diseases associated with EBV and CMV.
Keywords:cytomegalovirus  Epstein–  Barr virus  real‐time PCR  standardization  viral load
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号