Different relationships between galling and non-galling herbivore richness and plant species richness: a meta-analysis

The plant richness hypothesis (PRH) is used to explain herbivorous insect richness based on the number of plant species, predicting a positive relationship. However, the influence of plant richness on insect distribution can become stronger with greater levels of specialization of herbivores. In this meta-analysis, I tested whether there is any difference in the correlation force recorded between studies that investigated endophagous versus exophagous herbivores, and galling versus non-galling guilds, in order to determine whether more specialized groups have a stronger relationship. Furthermore, I calculated whether effect sizes were homogeneous between galling studies carried out at local and regional scales, and between tropical and temperate regions. A total of 52 correlations were analyzed between plant species richness and herbivore species richness, with 18 correlations derived from galling herbivores and 34 from non-galling herbivores. The effect sizes were significant and positive in all studies, being higher for endophages than for exophages, and for galling than for non-galling studies. These results provide evidence that groups of insects with a higher level of host specialization and specificity (e.g., endophagous and galling) exhibit a greater dependence on plant richness. There was no difference in effect sizes for galling studies between the local and regional level or between tropical and temperate groups. Despite the large variability found for galling studies, effect sizes were consistent independently of climatic region and latitudinal variation. These results suggest that the PRH for galling insects can be generalized to most ecosystem and vegetation types.