首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Incorporating climate change into ecosystem service assessments and decisions: a review
Authors:Rebecca K. Runting  Brett A. Bryan  Laura E. Dee  Fleur J. F. Maseyk  Lisa Mandle  Perrine Hamel  Kerrie A. Wilson  Kathleen Yetka  Hugh P. Possingham  Jonathan R. Rhodes
Affiliation:1. School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia;2. Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia;3. CSIRO, Urrbrae, SA, Australia;4. Institute on the Environment, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA;5. School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia;6. Natural Capital Project, Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Abstract:Climate change is having a significant impact on ecosystem services and is likely to become increasingly important as this phenomenon intensifies. Future impacts can be difficult to assess as they often involve long timescales, dynamic systems with high uncertainties, and are typically confounded by other drivers of change. Despite a growing literature on climate change impacts on ecosystem services, no quantitative syntheses exist. Hence, we lack an overarching understanding of the impacts of climate change, how they are being assessed, and the extent to which other drivers, uncertainties, and decision making are incorporated. To address this, we systematically reviewed the peer‐reviewed literature that assesses climate change impacts on ecosystem services at subglobal scales. We found that the impact of climate change on most types of services was predominantly negative (59% negative, 24% mixed, 4% neutral, 13% positive), but varied across services, drivers, and assessment methods. Although uncertainty was usually incorporated, there were substantial gaps in the sources of uncertainty included, along with the methods used to incorporate them. We found that relatively few studies integrated decision making, and even fewer studies aimed to identify solutions that were robust to uncertainty. For management or policy to ensure the delivery of ecosystem services, integrated approaches that incorporate multiple drivers of change and account for multiple sources of uncertainty are needed. This is undoubtedly a challenging task, but ignoring these complexities can result in misleading assessments of the impacts of climate change, suboptimal management outcomes, and the inefficient allocation of resources for climate adaptation.
Keywords:carbon sequestration  cumulative impacts  decision making  food provision  global change  global warming  land use change  uncertainty
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号