Temperature Response of Soil Respiration in a Chinese Pine Plantation: Hysteresis and Seasonal vs. Diel Q 10

Although the temperature response of soil respiration (R_s) has been studied extensively, several issues remain unresolved, including hysteresis in the R_s–temperature relationship and differences in the long- vs. short-term R_s sensitivity to temperature. Progress on these issues will contribute to reduced uncertainties in carbon cycle modeling. We monitored soil CO₂ efflux with an automated chamber system in a Pinus tabulaeformis plantation near Beijing throughout 2011. Soil temperature at 10-cm depth (T_s) exerted a strong control over R_s, with the annual temperature sensitivity (Q ₁₀) and basal rate at 10°C (R_{s 10}) being 2.76 and 1.40 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹, respectively. Both R_s and short-term (i.e., daily) estimates of R_{s 10} showed pronounced seasonal hysteresis with respect to T_s, with the efflux in the second half of the year being larger than that early in the season for a given temperature. The hysteresis may be associated with the confounding effects of microbial population dynamics and/or litter input. As a result, all of the applied regression models failed to yield unbiased estimates of R_s over the entire annual cycle. Lags between R_s and T_s were observed at the diel scale in the early and late growing season, but not in summer. The seasonality in these lags may be due to the use of a single T_s measurement depth, which failed to represent seasonal changes in the depth of CO₂ production. Daily estimates of Q ₁₀ averaged 2.04, smaller than the value obtained from the seasonal relationship. In addition, daily Q ₁₀ decreased with increasing T_s, which may contribute feedback to the climate system under global warming scenarios. The use of a fixed, universal Q ₁₀ is considered adequate when modeling annual carbon budgets across large spatial extents. In contrast, a seasonally-varying, environmentally-controlled Q ₁₀ should be used when short-term accuracy is required.