Amphioxus and the Utility of Molecular Genetic Data for Hypothesizing Body Part Homologies between Distantly Related Animals

Expression domains of developmental genes can indicate bodypart homologies between distantly related animals and give insightsinto interesting evolutionary questions. Two of the chief criteriafor recognizing homologies are relative position with respectto surrounding body parts and special quality (for instance,a vertebrate testis, regardless of its location, is recognizableby its seminiferous cysts or tubules). When overall body plansof two animals are relatively similar, as for amphioxus versusvertebrates, body part homologies can be supported by developmentalgene expression domains, which have properties of special qualityand relative position. With expression patterns of AmphiNk2-land AmphiPax2/5/8, we reexamine the proposed homology betweenthe amphioxus endostyle and the vertebrate thyroid gland, anda previously good homology is made better. When body plans ofanimals are disparate, body part homologies supported by moleculargenetic data are less convincing, because the criterion of relativeposition of gene expression domains becomes uncertain. Thus,when expression of amphioxus AmphiBMP2/4 is used to comparethe dorsoventral axis between amphioxus and other animals, acomparison between amphioxus and vertebrates is more convincingthan comparison between amphioxus and other invertebrates withdisparate body plans. In spite of this difficulty, the use ofdevelopmental genetic evidence comparing animals with disparatebody plans is currently putting the big picture of evolutioninto new perspective. For example, some molecular geneticistsare now suggesting that the last common ancestor of all bilateriananimals might have been more annelid-like than flatworm-like.