A comparison of serological techniques for detecting and identifying honeybee viruses

The sensitivity and specificity of conventional Ouchterlony gel-diffusion, immuno-osmoelectrophoresis (IO), immune serum electron microscopy (ISEM), “decoration,” radioimmunoassay (RIA), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests for detecting black queen cell virus (BQCV), chronic bee paralysis virus (CBPV), Kashmir bee virus (KBV), and sacbrood virus (SBV) particles in extracts of diseased honeybees were compared. A “slow” ISEM method detected virus particles in extracts of individuals or groups of individuals diluted to 10^?3 and 10^?4, respectively, whereas the IO method and a “fast” ISEM method using protein A were one-tenth as sensitive, and Ouchterlony gel-diffusion tests were only one-thousandth as sensitive. Using the antibody “decoration” technique, mixtures of serologically unrelated virus particles could be resolved. RIA and ELISA were found to be one thousand times more sensitive than ISEM in detecting the particles of BQCV, CBPV, KBV, and SBV; however, nonspecific reactions occurred when using RIA with very dilute particle suspensions, and this made dilution endpoints difficult to assess, but this did not occur when using the ELISA method. There was little difference in the effectiveness of rabbit or hen antisera in the tests, except when protein A was used as it does not combine with hen antibodies.