Development of metabolic syndrome components in adults with a healthy obese phenotype: A 3‐year follow‐up |
| |
Authors: | C. den Engelsen K.J. Gorter P.L. Salomé G.E. Rutten |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands;2. Huisartsenzorg IJsselstein, locatie't Steyn, Eiteren 15, 3401 PS IJsselstein, the Netherlands |
| |
Abstract: | Objective: There is a lack of data on the progression from a healthy obese phenotype toward an unhealthy obese phenotype and the development of metabolic syndrome (MetS). Our aim was to assess the development of MetS 3 years after screening in centrally obese individuals with a healthy obese phenotype and to evaluate the usefulness of repeated screening. Design and Methods: Eighty‐eight individuals (mean age 47 years, 88% female) with central obesity as their only MetS component (ATP III criteria) at baseline screening were re‐evaluated for MetS status after 3 years. Results: At follow‐up, the cardiometabolic risk profile in centrally obese individuals with a healthy phenotype showed a tendency toward deterioration. Thirty‐two percent developed at least one additional MetS component, 7% had developed MetS. Nobody had developed type 2 diabetes. An increased triglyceride level (n = 16) and an increased blood pressure (n = 18) were the components most often present at follow‐up. The people developing additional MetS components had a lower education level compared with the group that preserved the healthy centrally obese phenotype (80 vs. 71% lower educated, P = 0.35). They also had slightly worse baseline levels of the risk factors. Conclusion: The number of centrally obese individuals developing an unhealthy phenotype in this relatively short follow‐up period emphasizes the need for a regular surveillance of cardiometabolic parameters in centrally obese individuals. However, it is questionable whether a repeated screening for type 2 diabetes every 3 years, as recommended by the American Diabetes Association, in this category of patients is appropriate. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|