Paleontological completeness of the record of lower tertiary mollusks,U.S. Gulf and Atlantic coastal plains: Implications for phylogenetic studies

Choice of method in phylogenetic analysis should involve some consideration of the quality or completeness of the available fossil record. If it is poor, cladistic methods are preferable; if it is good, stratophenetic methods may be valid. A concept of paleontological completeness, defined herein, is useful for judging the quality of a given fossil record. This paper considers eight possible measures of paleontological completeness, and evaluates their value as phylogenetically useful estimates of the quality of the fossil record. Of the eight measures, Sadler‐Schindel type analysis of stratigraphic completeness and analysis of geographic ranges appear to be the most useful and reliable. The remaining six are useful only as rough approximations of the quality of the record, or as supporting evidence for conclusions based on other methods. Use of these eight measures on the lower Tertiary molluscan record of the U.S. Gulf and Atlantic coastal plains indicates that this record is approximately 30–50% complete. This is probably not complete enough to trust purely stratophenetic approaches to phylogenetic analysis, but is too complete to ignore the record in favor of a purely atemporal, cladistic approach. The concept of paleontological completeness may be useful in estimating the quality of this and other fossil records for non‐phylogenetic purposes, such as studies of evolutionary rates and diversity and extinction patterns.