Differences in calmodulin and calmodulin-binding proteins in phasic and tonic smooth muscles

To determine whether densities ofcalmodulin (CaM) and CaM-binding proteins are related to phasic andtonic behavior of smooth muscles, we quantified these proteins in theopossum esophageal body (EB) and lower esophageal sphincter (LES),which represent phasic and tonic smooth muscles, respectively. Gelelectrophoresis, immunoprecipitation, Western blot, and hemagglutininepitope-tagged CaM (HA-CaM) overlay assay with quantitative scanningdensitometry and phosphorylation measurements were used. Total proteincontent in the two smooth muscles was similar (~30 mg protein/gfrozen tissue). Total tissue concentration of CaM was significantly(25%) higher in EB than in LES (P < 0.05).HA-CaM-binding proteins were qualitatively similar in LES and EBextracts. Myosin, myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrateprotein, Ca²⁺/CaM kinase II, and calponin contents werealso similar in the two muscles. However, content and total activity ofmyosin light chain kinase (MLCK) and content of caldesmon (CaD) werethree- to fourfold higher in EB than in LES. Increased CaM and MLCKcontent may allow for a wide range of contractile force varying fromcomplete relaxation in the basal state to a large-amplitude,high-velocity contraction in EB phasic muscle. Increased content ofCaD, which provides a braking mechanism on contraction, may furthercontribute to the phasic contractile behavior. In contrast, low CaM,MLCK, and CaD content may be responsible for a small range ofcontractile force seen in tonic muscle of LES.