| Abstract: | In estuarine and coastal soft-sediment systems, the role that predators play in structuring communities appears to be variable. Attributes of a particular predator that influence its role in structuring the community include: the rate of prey consumption; the behaviour, morphology and mobility of the predator; and, in soft- sediment communities, sediment disturbances associated with feeding. Reviews of field experiments designed to assess the role of predators in influencing the structure and function of soft-sediment communities have concluded that many of the predators are generalists and there is usually a lack of competitive exclusion. Thus predation structures communities by many complex and indirect interactions that are often difficult to predict and generalize. Variations in the apparent strength and role of predation in structuring benthic communities may depend on a variety of ecosystem characteristics and/or aspects of study design. In this paper, I consider whether we have been conducting our experiments at the appropriate scales. Five case studies from Manukau Harbour (New Zealand) illustrate how small changes in the spatial scale can affect results, due to predator perceptions and prey mobility. The results of these studies demonstrate the need to identify scales at which predator effects are likely to be important and to fit experiments within the dynamics and heterogeneity of the system being studied. To do this, we need basic information on the natural history, behaviour and spatial and temporal variability of both predators and prey communities. We also need to be specific about scales of measurement when matching theoretical predictions to field observations/experiments. Finally, to enhance our ability to generalize from specific studies, we need to gather data that will enable us to both predict and test the importance of predation over a range of spatial and temporal scales. |
