Fluttering target detection in Hipposiderid bats

Summary Two species of Hipposiderid bats,Hiposideros speoris andH. lankadiva, which both emit short CF-FM echolocation calls, were trained in a two-alternative forced-choice procedure to discriminate between an oscillating target and a motionless one. Two different targets were used: (1) the membrane of a low-frequency loudspeaker, producing sinusoidal frequency- and amplitude modulations and (2) a small rotating propeller, which produced short acoustical glints. In both casesH. lankadiva learned to discriminate between the oscillating and the motionless target. When the loudspeaker was used, thresholds for minimal modulation depths at different oscillation frequencies were determined. At loudspeaker membrane oscillation frequencies of 10 to 100 Hz the 75% correct thresholds lay between 90 and 300 Hz (Fig. 3).H. speoris could not be trained to react to the moving membrane, even at very high oscillation amplitudes. When the rotating propeller was the positive target, however,H. speoris learned very quickly to discriminate it from a motionless one. By decreasing the rotation speed it was possible to measure the minimal detectable glint-frequency for each bat. It lay at 67, 44, and just under 15 glints/s for the three specimens (Fig. 4). During the discrimination task both bat species increased their duty-cycle just prior to a decision by emitting long sequences of echolocation calls with short inter-pulse intervals. The duration of individual pulses remained relatively constant (Figs. 6 and 7). Possible mechanisms for discrimination of the oscillating targets are discussed and the importance of glints in the echoes for fluttering target detection is emphasized.Abbreviations A₀ amplitude of loudspeaker membrane oscillation - AM amplitude modulation - CF constant frequency - DC duty-cycle - FM frequency modulation - f_max maximal frequency modulation depth in echo - PD pulse duration - PI pulse interval - f_osc oscillation frequency