首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

蚜虱净对苜蓿主要害虫及天敌种群数量的影响
引用本文:刘长仲,严林,张新瑞,陈应武,张方. 蚜虱净对苜蓿主要害虫及天敌种群数量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(10): 5188-5193
作者姓名:刘长仲  严林  张新瑞  陈应武  张方
作者单位:1. 甘肃农业大学草业学院昆虫学系,兰州,730070
2. 青海大学农牧学院草业科学系,西宁,810003
3. 甘肃农业大学图书馆,兰州,730070
基金项目:国家教育部草业生态系统重点实验室基金,国家自然科学基金,国家科技支撑计划,甘肃省教育厅科学基金 
摘    要:在甘肃省定西市九华沟系统研究了喷施蚜虱净对苜蓿主要害虫及天敌种群数量动态的影响。结果表明,施药田蚜虫和蓟马的季节平均数量极显著高于对照田,而盲蝽和瓢虫、小花蝽、蜘蛛等大多数天敌的季节平均数量则极显著低于对照田,寄生蜂与对照田没有湿著差异。喷施蚜虱净对种群数量时序动态的影响在不同害虫和天敌种类中表现不同,5月底施药后7d对照田蚜虫和蓟马的种群数量分别为施药田的4.13倍和5.2倍,此后施药田害虫的种群数量开始迅速增加,到6月底2种害虫的种群数量均与对照田无显著差异,到7月中旬以后反而显著高于对照田。施药对盲蝽种群数量时序动态的影响与蚜虫和蓟马不同,5月底施药后盲蝽的种群数量一直显著低于对照田,直到7月下旬以后,种群数量才恢复到对照田的水平。喷施蚜虱净对天敌种群数量的时序动态有极显著的影响,大多数天敌的种群数量在5月底施药后到7月底都一直显著低于对照田,直到8月上旬才恢复到对照田的水平。施用杀虫剂在防治害虫的同时杀伤大量天敌,使害虫的种群数量迅速增加,甚至造成更严重的为害。因此在菖蓿上使用对天敌杀伤力小的杀虫剂对保持天敌的自然控制能力有重要作用。

关 键 词:苜蓿  害虫  天敌  种群动态  杀虫剂
收稿时间:2007-05-06
修稿时间:2008-05-08

Effects of imidacloprid spraying on the population dynamics of main insect pests and natural enemies on alfalfa
LIU Chang-Zhong,YAN Lin,ZHANG Xin-Rui,CHEN Ying-Wu,ZHANG Fang. Effects of imidacloprid spraying on the population dynamics of main insect pests and natural enemies on alfalfa[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(10): 5188-5193
Authors:LIU Chang-Zhong  YAN Lin  ZHANG Xin-Rui  CHEN Ying-Wu  ZHANG Fang
Abstract:The effect of imidacloprid spray on the population dynamics of primary insect pests and their natural enemies in alfalfa fields was evaluated in DingXi, Gansu Province in 2002. The average number of aphids and thrips across the entire post-spray period (From late May to August 2002) was significantly higher in imidacloprid-treated fields than in untreated fields, while the average number of plant bugs and most natural enemies including coccinellids, Orius minutus, and spiders was drastically reduced in the treated fields. The average population size of parasitic wasps was not significantly different in the treated fields compared with untreated fields across the entire post-spray period. It appeared that imidacloprid spray differentially affected the population dynamics among different insect pests and natural enemies. On the seventh day post-spray in late May, the populations of aphids and thrips in the treated fields were 4.13-fold and 5.2-fold lower than in the untreated fields, respectively. However, these pest populations recovered and increased rapidly in the treated fields. The population numbers were similar by the end of June and even significantly higher than the untreated fields by mid-July. For plant bugs, the population was significantly inhibited in the treated fields in late May, but by late July the population recuperated to untreated-field level. The natural enemies investigated were significantly affected in the treated fields compared with the untreated fields during the period from the imidacloprid spray performed in late May to the end of July. Most natural enemy populations recovered and reached untreated-field levels by early August These observations suggest that imidacloprid spray inhibited insect pest populations only temporarily. Pest populations recovered rapidly resulting in even more serious pest infestation occurring in the late season because of negative impacts of pesticide spray upon the natural enemies.
Keywords:Alfalfa(Medicago sativa L.)   insect pest   natural enemies   population dynamics   insecticide
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生态学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号