Risk Factors for Treatment Default among Re-Treatment Tuberculosis Patients in India, 2006 |
| |
Authors: | Ugra Mohan Jha Srinath Satyanarayana Puneet K. Dewan Sarabjit Chadha Fraser Wares Suvanand Sahu Devesh Gupta L. S. Chauhan |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Central Tuberculosis Division, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India.; 2. Centre for Operational Research, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (The Union), New Delhi, India.; 3. Office of the WHO Representative to India, New Delhi, India.;McGill University, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | SettingUnder India''s Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP), >15% of previously-treated patients in the reported 2006 patient cohort defaulted from anti-tuberculosis treatment.ObjectiveTo assess the timing, characteristics, and risk factors for default amongst re-treatment TB patients.MethodologyFor this case-control study, in 90 randomly-selected programme units treatment records were abstracted from all 2006 defaulters from the RNTCP re-treatment regimen (cases), with one consecutively-selected non-defaulter per case. Patients who interrupted anti-tuberculosis treatment for >2 months were classified as defaulters.Results1,141 defaulters and 1,189 non-defaulters were included. The median duration of treatment prior to default was 81 days (25%–75% interquartile range 44–117 days) and documented retrieval efforts after treatment interruption were inadequate. Defaulters were more likely to have been male (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–1.7), have previously defaulted anti-tuberculosis treatment (aOR 1.3 95%CI 1.1–1.6], have previous treatment from non-RNTCP providers (AOR 1.3, 95%CI 1.0–1.6], or have public health facility-based treatment observation (aOR 1.3, 95%CI 1.1–1.6).ConclusionsAmongst the large number of re-treatment patients in India, default occurs early and often. Improved pre-treatment counseling and community-based treatment provision may reduce default rates. Efforts to retrieve treatment interrupters prior to default require strengthening. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|