Choice and timing in concurrent chains: effects of initial-link duration

Theories of timing have been applied to choice between delayed rewards by assuming that delays are represented in memory and that subjects sample from memory when choosing between alternatives. To search for covariation in single-trial measures of performance that might confirm this assumption, we used a procedure that allowed for convergent measurement of choice and timing behavior. Four pigeons responded in a concurrent chains/peak procedure in which the terminal links were fixed-interval (FI) 8s and FI 16s, across conditions the duration of the initial-link schedule was either short or long, and one quarter of the terminal links lasted for 48 s and ended without reinforcer delivery. Preference for the FI 8-s alternative was stronger with shorter initial links, replicating the 'initial-link effect'. Responding on no-food trials was unaffected by initial-link duration, and aggregated across trials, was typical of the peak procedure: response distributions were approximately Gaussian, with modes near the FI schedule durations, and variance was greater for the FI 16-s terminal link. Analysis of local measures of initial-link performance (e.g., pause to begin responding, time spent responding, number and duration of visits to each alternative, etc.) found that the initial-link effect was associated with an increase in the number and duration of visits per cycle to the nonpreferred alternative. Regression analyses showed that local initial-link measures contributed relatively little additional variance in predicting performance on individual no-food trials beyond that accounted for by FI schedule. Our results provide no clear evidence that initial- and terminal-link responding in concurrent chains are mediated by a common representation of terminal-link delays.