Computational Approaches to Solving Equations Arising from Wound Healing

In the wound healing process, the cell movement associated with chemotaxis generally outweighs the movement associated with random motion, leading to advection-dominated mathematical models of wound healing. The equations in these models must be solved with care, but often inappropriate approaches are adopted. Two one-dimensional test problems arising from advection-dominated models of wound healing are solved using four algorithms—MATLAB’s inbuilt routine pdepe.m, the Numerical Algorithms Group routine d03pcf.f, and two finite volume methods. The first finite volume method is based on a first-order upwinding treatment of chemotaxis terms and the second on a flux limiting approach. The first test problem admits an analytic solution which can be used to validate the numerical results by analyzing two measures of the error for each method: the average absolute difference and a mass balance error. These criteria as well as the visual comparison between the numerical methods and the exact solution lead us to conclude that flux limiting is the best approach to solving advection-dominated wound healing problems numerically in one dimension. The second test problem is a coupled nonlinear three species model of wound healing angiogenesis. Measurement of the mass balance error for this test problem further confirms our hypothesis that flux limiting is the most appropriate method for solving advection-dominated governing equations in wound healing models. We also consider two two-dimensional test problems arising from wound healing, one that admits an analytic solution and a more complicated problem of blood vessels growth into a devascularized wound bed. The results from the two-dimensional test problems also demonstrate that the flux limiting treatment of advective terms is ideal for an advection-dominated problem.