首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


A tale of two polar bear populations: ice habitat, harvest, and body condition
Authors:Karyn D Rode  Elizabeth Peacock  Mitchell Taylor  Ian Stirling  Erik W Born  Kristin L Laidre  Øystein Wiig
Institution:(1) US Fish and Wildlife Service, Marine Mammals Management, 1011 E Tudor Road, Anchorage, AK 99503, USA;(2) Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut, Igloolik, NU, X0A 0L0, Canada;(3) Present address: US Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, 4210 University Drive, Anchorage, AK 99508, USA;(4) Faculty of Science and Environmental Studies, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON, P7B 5E1, Canada;(5) Wildlife Research Division, Environment Canada, 5320 122 St., Edmonton, AB, T6G 3S5, Canada;(6) Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E9, Canada;(7) Greenland Institute of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 570, 3900 Nuuk, Greenland;(8) Polar Science Center, Applied Physics Lab, University of Washington, 1013 NE, 40th Street, Seattle, WA 98105, USA;(9) Greenland Institute of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 570, 3900 Nuuk, Greenland;(10) National Centre for Biosystematics, Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, PO Box 1172, Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway
Abstract:One of the primary mechanisms by which sea ice loss is expected to affect polar bears is via reduced body condition and growth resulting from reduced access to prey. To date, negative effects of sea ice loss have been documented for two of 19 recognized populations. Effects of sea ice loss on other polar bear populations that differ in harvest rate, population density, and/or feeding ecology have been assumed, but empirical support, especially quantitative data on population size, demography, and/or body condition spanning two or more decades, have been lacking. We examined trends in body condition metrics of captured bears and relationships with summertime ice concentration between 1977 and 2010 for the Baffin Bay (BB) and Davis Strait (DS) polar bear populations. Polar bears in these regions occupy areas with annual sea ice that has decreased markedly starting in the 1990s. Despite differences in harvest rate, population density, sea ice concentration, and prey base, polar bears in both populations exhibited positive relationships between body condition and summertime sea ice cover during the recent period of sea ice decline. Furthermore, females and cubs exhibited relationships with sea ice that were not apparent during the earlier period (1977–1990s) when sea ice loss did not occur. We suggest that declining body condition in BB may be a result of recent declines in sea ice habitat. In DS, high population density and/or sea ice loss, may be responsible for the declines in body condition.
Keywords:Body size  Climate change  Morphometrics  Population density  Sea ice  Ursus maritimus
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号