首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


N-acylethanolamine-hydrolyzing acid amidase and fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibition differentially affect N-acylethanolamine levels and macrophage activation
Institution:1. Bioanalysis and Pharmacology of Bioactive Lipids Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium;2. Center for Drug Discovery, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, United States;3. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, United States;1. Manchester Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, The University of Manchester, M13 9PT, UK;2. Dept of Biological Sciences, Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA 92612, USA;1. Department of Cellular Physiological Chemistry, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan;2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan;3. Research Administration Division, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan;1. Department of Urology, Kagawa University Faculty of Medicine, 1750-1 Ikenobe, Miki, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan;2. Department of Biochemistry, Kagawa University Faculty of Medicine, 1750-1 Ikenobe, Miki, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan
Abstract:N-acylethanolamines (NAEs) such as N-palmitoylethanolamine and anandamide are endogenous bioactive lipids having numerous functions, including the control of inflammation. Their levels and therefore actions can be controlled by modulating the activity of two hydrolytic enzymes, N-acylethanolamine-hydrolyzing acid amidase (NAAA) and fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH). As macrophages are key to inflammatory processes, we used lipopolysaccharide-activated J774 macrophages, as well as primary mouse alveolar macrophages, to study the effect of FAAH and NAAA inhibition, using PF-3845 and AM9053 respectively, on macrophage activation and NAE levels measured by HPLC-MS. Markers of macrophage activation were measured by qRT-PCR and ELISA. Activation of macrophages decreased NAAA expression and NAE hydrolytic activity. FAAH and NAAA inhibition increased the levels of the different NAEs, although with different magnitudes, whether in control condition or following LPS-induced macrophage activation. Both inhibitors reduced several markers of macrophage activation, such as mRNA expression of inflammatory mediators, as well as cytokine and prostaglandin production, with however some differences between FAAH and NAAA inhibition. Most of the NAEs tested – including N-docosatetraenoylethanolamine and N-docosahexaenoylethanolamine – also reduced LPS-induced mRNA expression of inflammatory mediators, again with differences depending on the marker and the NAE, thus offering a potential explanation for the differential effect of the inhibitors on macrophage activation markers. In conclusion, we show different and complementary effects of NAE on lipopolysaccharide-induced macrophage activation. Our results support an important role for inhibition of NAE hydrolysis and NAAA inhibition in particular in controlling macrophage activation, and thus inflammation.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号