Mechanism of Epac Activation: STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL ANALYSES OF Epac2 HINGE MUTANTS WITH CONSTITUTIVE AND REDUCED ACTIVITIES*

Epac2 is a member of the family of exchange proteins directly activated by cAMP (Epac). Our previous studies suggest a model of Epac activation in which cAMP binding to the enzyme induces a localized “hinge” motion that reorients the regulatory lobe relative to the catalytic lobe without inducing large conformational changes within individual lobes. In this study, we identified the location of the major hinge in Epac2 by normal mode motion correlation and structural alignment analyses. Targeted mutagenesis was then performed to test the functional importance of hinge bending for Epac activation. We show that substitution of the conserved residue phenylalanine 435 with glycine (F435G) facilitates the hinge bending and leads to a constitutively active Epac2 capable of stimulating nucleotide exchange in the absence of cAMP. In contrast, substitution of the same residue with a bulkier side chain, tryptophan (F435W), impedes the hinge motion and results in a dramatic decrease in Epac2 catalytic activity. Structural parameters determined by small angle x-ray scattering further reveal that whereas the F435G mutant assumes a more extended conformation in the absence of cAMP, the F435W mutant is incapable of adopting the fully extended and active conformation in the presence of cAMP. These findings demonstrate the importance of hinge motion in Epac activation. Our study also suggests that phenylalanine at position 435 is the optimal size side chain to keep Epac closed and inactive in the absence of cAMP while still allowing the proper hinge motion for full Epac extension and activation in the presence of cAMP.Exchange proteins directly activated by cAMP (Epac)² are a family of novel intracellular sensors for the second messenger cAMP (1, 2). Unlike the classic eukaryotic cAMP receptor, cAMP-dependent protein kinase (protein kinase A; PKA), Epac proteins do not function as protein kinases that phosphorylate downstream substrates. Instead, they act as guanine nucleotide exchange factors and exert their functions by activating small GTP-binding proteins, Rap1 and Rap2. At the cellular level, Epac proteins assume distinct subcellular localization (3), and depending upon the specific cellular environment, Epac and PKA may act independently, converge synergistically, or oppose each other in regulating a specific cellular function (4, 5).Both Epac and PKA share a common cyclic nucleotide binding domain (CBD), a compact and evolutionarily conserved structural motif found in a variety of proteins with diverse cellular functions (6). CBDs act as molecular switches for sensing intracellular second messenger cAMP levels and regulate the functionality of the domain(s) to which they are linked (6, 7). In depth structural and biophysical analyses of CBDs in several CBD-containing families, including cAMP receptor proteins, PKAs, and cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels, have revealed a conserved structural core as well as functional motifs important for cyclic nucleotide-induced activation (8–11). The CBD is composed of an eight-strand β-barrel core that forms the base of the nucleotide binding pocket and a lateral α-helical bundle subdomain. Although the β-barrel core remains relatively constant between the ligand-free and nucleotide-bound states, binding of cAMP to a CBD leads to significant conformational changes in the overall arrangement of the α-helical bundle subdomain. A general mechanism of cyclic nucleotide-induced activation of CBD-containing proteins has been recently proposed (12). In this model, binding of cAMP leads to the retraction of the phosphate-binding cassette toward the cyclic nucleotide binding pocket and consequently releases the steric hindrance imposed on the α-helix C-terminal to the β-barrel, termed the CBD lid, by a conserved hydrophobic residue within the phosphate-binding cassette. These structural changes result in a hinge motion that allows the lid to move closer to the β-barrel core and to interact with the base of the cyclic nucleotide.The recently solved crystal structure of Epac2 reveals that, unlike other CBD-containing proteins, the corresponding lid region in Epac points away from the cAMP binding pocket as a two-strand β-sheet that forms the first part of the five-strand β-sheet “switchboard” structure (13). Although this major structural difference suggests that the detailed mechanisms of PKA and Epac activation by cAMP will most likely be different at the atomic level, it is not clear if the aforementioned general mechanism, namely the hinge motion, is conserved during Epac activation. To address this important question, we determined the effects of targeted hinge perturbations on Epac activation using site-directed mutagenesis that specifically targeted a key residue in the hinge region of Epac2.