Feather mite abundance varies but symbiotic nature of mite‐host relationship does not differ between two ecologically dissimilar warblers |
| |
Authors: | Alix E. Matthews Jeffery L. Larkin Douglas W. Raybuck Morgan C. Slevin Scott H. Stoleson Than J. Boves |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR, USA;2. Department of Biology, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA;3. Department of Biology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA, USA;4. Department of Forestry, Wildlife, and Fisheries, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA;5. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Northern Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Irvine, PA, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Feather mites are obligatory ectosymbionts of birds that primarily feed on the oily secretions from the uropygial gland. Feather mite abundance varies within and among host species and has various effects on host condition and fitness, but there is little consensus on factors that drive variation of this symbiotic system. We tested hypotheses regarding how within‐species and among‐species traits explain variation in both (1) mite abundance and (2) relationships between mite abundance and host body condition and components of host fitness (reproductive performance and apparent annual survival). We focused on two closely related (Parulidae), but ecologically distinct, species: Setophaga cerulea (Cerulean Warbler), a canopy dwelling open‐cup nester, and Protonotaria citrea (Prothonotary Warbler), an understory dwelling, cavity nester. We predicted that feather mites would be more abundant on and have a more parasitic relationship with P. citrea, and within P. citrea, females and older individuals would harbor greater mite abundances. We captured, took body measurements, quantified feather mite abundance on individuals’ primaries and rectrices, and monitored individuals and their nests to estimate fitness. Feather mite abundance differed by species, but in the opposite direction of our prediction. There was no relationship between mite abundance and any measure of body condition or fitness for either species or sex (also contrary to our predictions). Our results suggest that species biology and ecological context may influence mite abundance on hosts. However, this pattern does not extend to differential effects of mites on measures of host body condition or fitness. |
| |
Keywords: | feather mites host‐symbiont interactions Parulidae Proctophyllodidae symbiosis |
|
|