首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Spatial ecology of wolverines at the southern periphery of distribution
Authors:Robert M. Inman  Mark L. Packila  Kristine H. Inman  Anthony J. Mccue  Gary C. White  Jens Persson  Bryan C. Aber  Mark L. Orme  Kurt L. Alt  Steven L. Cain  Jay A. Fredrick  Bob J. Oakleaf  Shawn S. Sartorius
Affiliation:1. Wildlife Conservation Society and Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 222 East Main Street, Lone Elk Suite 3B, Ennis, MT 59729, USA;2. Wildlife Conservation Society, 222 East Main Street, Lone Elk Suite 3B, Ennis, MT 59729, USA;3. Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA;4. Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-730 91 Riddarhyttan, Sweden;5. Idaho Department of Fish and Game;6. United States Forest Service, Caribou-Targhee National Forest;7. and Wildlife Conservation Society, 3726 Highway 20, Island Park, ID 83429, USA;8. United States Forest Service, Caribou-Targhee National Forest, 1405 Hollipark Drive, Idaho Falls, ID 83401, USA;9. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, 1400 South 19th, Bozeman, MT 59718, USA;10. National Park Service, Grand Teton National Park, Drawer 170, Moose, WY 83012, USA;11. United States Forest Service, Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, 5 Forest Service Road, Ennis, MT 59729, USA;12. Wyoming Game and Fish Department, 260 Beauna Vista, Lander, WY 82520, USA;13. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 585 Shepard Way, Helena, MT 59601, USA
Abstract:Wolverines (Gulo gulo) in the conterminous United States have experienced range contraction, are uncommon, and have been designated as warranted for protection under the United States Endangered Species Act. Data from the southern edge of the wolverine's circumpolar distribution is sparse, and development of effective conservation strategies would benefit from a more complete understanding of the species' ecology. We captured and radio-monitored 30 wolverines in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE), tested for seasonal habitat selection by elevation band, and examined a suite of spatial characteristics to clarify our understanding of the wolverine's niche. Wolverines in GYE selected for areas >2,600 m latitude-adjusted elevation (LAE; n = 2,257 wolverine locations [12 F, 6 M]). Wolverines avoided areas <2,150 m LAE, including during winter when the vast majority of ungulates are pushed to these elevations by deep snow. Wolverine home ranges were large relative to body size, averaging 303 km2 for adult females and 797 km2 for adult males (n = 13 [8 F, 5 M] and 33 wolverine-years). Resident adults fit with Global Positioning System (GPS) collars used an area >75% the size of their multi-year home range in an average of 32 days (n = 7 [5 F, 2 M]). Average movement rates of 1.3 km/2-hr indicated that both sexes move distances equivalent to the diameter of their home range every 2 days or the circumference of their home range in <1 week (n = 1,329 2-hr movements, n = 12 individuals [7 F, 5 M]). This capability for movement, the short time-frame over which home ranges were developed, and a lack of home range overlap by same sex adults (equation image , 90% CI = 0.0–4.8%, n = 22 pairs) suggested territoriality. We estimated wolverine density to be 3.5/1,000 km2 of area >2,150 m LAE (95% CI = 2.8–9.6). Dispersal movements extended to at least 170 km for both sexes (n = 5 F, 2 M). At the southern edge of distribution, where suitable and unsuitable conditions exist in close proximity, wolverines selected high-elevation areas near alpine tree-line where a mix of forest, meadow, and boulder fields were present, deep snow-cover existed during winter, and low temperatures near freezing can occur throughout the year. Persistence in these areas where the growing season is brief requires large home ranges that are regularly patrolled, a social system that provides exclusive access to resources, and low densities. These characteristics, along with low reproductive rates, are prevalent throughout the species range, indicating that wolverines are specialists at exploiting a cold, unproductive niche where interspecific competition is limited. The vulnerability inherent in occupying this unproductive niche was likely influential in previous declines within the conterminous United States and will remain a factor as wolverines encounter modern human influences. Conserving wolverines in the conterminous United States will require collaborative management over a large geographic scale. © 2011 The Wildlife Society.
Keywords:density  dispersal  Gulo gulo  home range  movement  niche  territory  wolverine  Yellowstone
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号