Effects of fire on sward structure and grazing in western Serengeti, Tanzania |
| |
Authors: | Shombe N Hassan Graciela M Rusch Håkan Hytteborn Christina Skarpe Idris Kikula |
| |
Institution: | Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway;, Department of Wildlife Management, Sokoine University of Agriculture, PO Box 3073, Morogoro, Tanzania;, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Tungasletta 2, NO-7485, Trondheim, Norway;, Faculty of Forestry and Wildlife Management, Hedmark University College, NO-2480 Koppang, Norway;and Institute of Resources Assessments, University of Dar es Salaam, PO Box 35097, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania |
| |
Abstract: | In Serengeti fire is used as a management tool to improve the forage quality for large herbivores. However, little is known of the effects of fire on grazing resources particularly sward structure, its influence on herbivore forage patch selection and utilization to the relative amount of phytomass consumed in burnt and nonburnt patches. From September 2003 to July 2004, consumption of phytomass by large herbivores was assessed with eight samplings in six grassland sites in the Western Corridor in Serengeti National Park. Each site had burnt and nonburnt plots. Movable cages were used to exclude grazing between samplings and plant material harvests were used to assess phytomass and sward structure changes in time. Nonburnt grasslands had consistently larger phytomass at all sampling events whereas the ratio for live leaf/total phytomass was higher in burnt grassland at early postfire stages, but declined later in the season. Moreover, periodic consumption of both total phytomass and different phytomass components shifted between burnt and nonburnt grasslands, but there were also large site-specific responses. The shift appears to be related to the balance between the amount of phytomass available and the quality of the forage in terms of the ratio between live and total phytomass. The study highlights the significance of maintaining mosaics of burnt and nonburnt areas with an adequate provision of forage amount and quality all year round. |
| |
Keywords: | consumption forage quality optimal foraging phytomass savanna management vegetation dynamics |
|
|