Perceptions of Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing (ACASI) among Women in an HIV-Positive Prevention Program |
| |
Authors: | Larissa J. Estes Linda E. Lloyd Michelle Teti Sheela Raja Lisa Bowleg Kristi L. Allgood Nancy Glick |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. School of Public Health, University of Texas, Houston, Texas, United States of America.; 2. School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.; 3. College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.; 4. Sinai Urban Health Institute, Sinai Health System, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.;University of Toronto, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | BackgroundAudio Computer-Assisted Self Interviewing (ACASI) has improved the reliability and accuracy of self-reported HIV health and risk behavior data, yet few studies account for how participants experience the data collection process.Methodology/Principal FindingsThis exploratory qualitative analysis aimed to better understand the experience and implications of using ACASI among HIV-positive women participating in sexual risk reduction interventions in Chicago (n = 12) and Philadelphia (n = 18). Strategies of Grounded Theory were used to explore participants'' ACASI experiences.Conclusion/SignificanceKey themes we identified included themes that could be attributed to the ACASI and other methods of data collection (e.g., paper-based self-administered questionnaire or face-to-face interviews). The key themes were usability; privacy and honesty; socially desirable responses and avoiding judgment; and unintentional discomfort resulting from recalling risky behavior using the ACASI. Despite both positive and negative findings about the ACASI experience, we conclude that ACASI is in general an appropriate method for collecting sensitive data about HIV/AIDS risk behaviors among HIV-positive women because it seemed to ensure privacy in the study population allowing for more honest responses, minimize socially desirable responses, and help participants avoid actual or perceived judgment. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|