Effect of elevated CO2 on the utilization of light energy in Nothofagus fusca and Pinus radiata

Red beech (Nothofagus fusca (Hook. F.) Oerst.; Fagaceae) andradiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don; Pinaceae) were grown for16 months in large open-top chambers at ambient (37 Pa) andelevated (66 Pa) atmospheric partial pressure of CO₂, and incontrol plots (no chamber). Summer-time measurements showedthat photosynthetic capacity was similar at elevated CO₂ (lightand CO₂-saturated value of 17.2 µmol m^–2 s^–1for beech, 13.5 µmol m^–2 s^–1 for pine), plantsgrown at ambient CO₂ (beech 21.0 µmol^–2 s^–1,pine 14.9 µmol m^–2s^–1) or control plants grownwithout chambers (beech 23.2 µmol m^–2 s^–1,pine 12.9 µmol m^–2 s^–1). However, the higherCO₂ partial pressure had a direct effect on photosynthetic rate,such that under their respective growth conditions, photosynthesisfor the elevated CO₂ treatment (measured at 70 Pa CO₂ partialpressure: beech 14.1 µmol m^–2 s^–1 pine 10.3)was greater than in ambient (measured at 35 Pa CO₂: beech 9.7µmol m^–2 s^–1, pine 7.0 µmol m^–2s^–1) or control plants (beech 10.8 µmol m^–2s^–1, pine 7.2 µmol m^–2 s^–1). Measurementsof chlorophyll fluorescence revealed no evidence of photodamagein any treatment for either species. The quantity of the photoprotectivexanthophyll cycle pigments and their degree of de-epoxidationat midday did not differ among treatments for either species.The photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (yield) was lowerin control plants than in chamber-grown plants, and was higherin chamber plants at ambient than at elevated CO₂. These resultssuggest that at lower (ambient) CO₂ partial pressure, beechplants may have dissipated excess energy by a mechanism thatdoes not involve the xanthophyll cycle pigments. Key words: Carotenoids, chlorophyll fluorescence, photosynthesis, photoinhibition, photoprotection, xanthophyll cycle