首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Occupational radiation exposure in vascular interventional radiology: A complete evaluation of different body regions
Affiliation:1. Dept of Physics and Biophysics, Biosciences Institute of Botucatu, São Paulo State University, Distrito de Rubião Junior S/N, Botucatu, São Paulo 18618-000, Brazil;2. Brasilian Center of Physics Research -CBPF-MCT, Rio de Janeiro 22290-180, Brazil;3. Dept of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, Distrito de Rubião Junior S/N, Botucatu, São Paulo 18618-000, Brazil;4. Dept of Tropical Diseases and Diagnostic Imaging, Botucatu Medical School, Univ Estadual Paulista, Distrito de Rubião Junior S/N, Botucatu, São Paulo 18618-000, Brazil;1. Instituto de Biociências de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista (IBB-UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil;2. Hospital de Clínicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (HC-UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil;3. Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista (FMB-UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
Abstract:PurposeTo perform a complete evaluation on radiation doses, received by primary and assistant medical staff, while performing different vascular interventional radiology procedures.Materials and methodsWe evaluated dose received in different body regions during three categories of vascular procedures: lower limb angiography (Angiography), lower limb percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (Angioplasty) and stent graft placement for abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment (A. A. A. Treatment). We positioned the dosimeters near the eye lens, thyroid, chest, abdomen, hands, and feet of the interventional physicians. Equivalent dose was compared with annual dose limits for workers in order to determine the maximum number of procedures per year that each physician could perform. We assessed 90 procedures.ResultsWe found the highest equivalent doses in the A. A. A. Treatment, in which 90% of the evaluations indicated at least one region receiving more than 1 mSv per procedure. Angioplasty was the only procedural modality that provided statistically different doses for different professionals, which is an important aspect on regards to radiological protection strategies. In comparison with the dose limits, the most critical region in all procedures was the eye lens.ConclusionsSince each body region of the interventionist is exposed to different radiation levels, dose distribution measurements are essential for radiological protection strategies. These results indicate that dosimeters placed in abdomen instead of chest may represent more accurately the whole body doses received by the medical staff. Additional dosimeters and a stationary shield for the eye lens are strongly recommended.
Keywords:Radiation protection  Interventional radiology  Occupational exposure
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号