首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Availability of applying diaphragm matching with the breath-holding technique in stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver tumors
Institution:1. Section of Radiation Therapy, Department of Clinical Support, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima City 734-8551, Japan;2. Course of Medical and Dental Sciences, Graduate School of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima City 734-8551, Japan;3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima City 734-8551, Japan;1. Medical Physics Unit, Department of Radiation Oncology, SMBD Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada;2. RCF Consulting, LLC, 54 Benedict Road, Monroe, Connecticut 06468
Abstract:PurposeImage-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) based on bone matching can produce large target-positioning errors because of expiration breath-hold reproducibility during stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver tumors. Therefore, the feasibility of diaphragm-based 3D image matching between planning computed tomography (CT) and pretreatment cone-beam CT was investigated.MethodsIn 59 liver SBRT cases, Lipiodol uptake after transarterial chemoembolization was defined as a tumor marker. Further, the relative isocenter coordinate that was obtained by Lipiodol matching was defined as the reference coordinate. The distance between the relative isocenter coordinate and reference coordinate, which was obtained from diaphragm matching and bone matching techniques, was defined as the target positioning error. Furthermore, the target positioning error between liver matching and Lipiodol matching was evaluated.ResultsThe positioning errors in all directions by the diaphragm matching were significantly smaller than those obtained by using by the bone matching technique (p < 0.05). Further, the positioning errors in the A-P and C-C directions that were obtained by using liver matching were significantly smaller than those obtained by using bone matching (p < 0.05). The estimated PTV margins calculated by the formula proposed by van Herk for diaphragm matching, liver matching, and bone matching were 5.0 mm, 5.0 mm, and 11.6 mm in the C-C direction; 3.6 mm, 2.4 mm, and 6.9 mm in the A-P direction; and 2.6 mm, 4.1 mm, and 4.6 mm in the L-R direction, respectively.ConclusionsDiaphragm matching-based IGRT may be an alternative image matching technique for determining liver tumor positions in patients.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号