首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Bone Marrow Response to Damage Induced By Hydroxyurea Or Colchicine
Authors:E Ne&#;as
Institution:Department of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechoslovakia
Abstract:The extent of bone marrow damage caused by the administration of single or repeated doses of either hydroxyurea (1000 mg/kg b.w.) or colchicine (1 mg/kg b.w.) are comparable. This conclusion is based on serial studies of bone marrow cellularity and of the CFUc numbers in the bone marrow. the proliferation response of the pluripotential haemopoietic stem cells, determined by the cells forming colonies in the spleen of lethally irradiated mice (CFUs) markedly differs if the bone marrow damage is caused by hydroxyurea or colchicine. While hydroxyurea administration stimulates a large proportion of the resting G0 cells into the cell cycle, the damage induced by colchicine is followed by only a mild increase in the CFUs proliferation rate. The seeding efficiency of the spleen colony technique has been determined after both hydroxyurea and colchicine administration. This parameter, important for the estimation of the number of the pluripotential haemopoietic stem cells in blood forming organs, is significantly affected by hydroxyurea administration, but also by repeated injections of colchicine. Following a single dose of hydroxyurea, the time-course of the CFUs numbers, which were corrected for the change in the seeding efficiency, shows an overshoot occurring after 18–20 hr. At the other time periods, the number of pluripotential haemopoietic stem cells is little affected by a single hydroxyurea injection. This poses a question about the nature of the stimulus, which after hydroxyurea administration triggers the CFUs from the resting G0 state into the cell cycle. There is evidence that this stimulus is probably not represented by the damage caused to the various intensively proliferating cell populations of the bone marrow. This evidence is based on experiments which show that colchicine induced damage, of a degree similar to that after hydroxyurea, does not stimulate the CFUs proliferation rate to an extent comparable to hydroxyurea. The possibility that colchicine could block CFUs in the G0 state or that it could interfere with the progress of CFUs through the G1 and S phases of the cell cycle have been ruled out by experiments which demonstrated that colchicine (1 mg/kg b.w.), administered 10 min before hydroxyurea, does not reduce the number of CFUs triggered into the cell cycle as the consequence of hydroxyurea administration.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号