首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Achieving consistency in life cycle assessment practice within the European construction sector: the role of the EeBGuide InfoHub
Authors:Sébastien Lasvaux  Johannes Gantner  Bastian Wittstock  Manuel Bazzana  Nicoleta Schiopu  Tom Saunders  Cristina Gazulla  Jo Ann Mundy  Christer Sjöström  Pere Fullana-i-Palmer  Tim Barrow-Williams  Anna Braune  Jane Anderson  Katrin Lenz  Zsoka Takacs  Julien Hans  Jacques Chevalier
Institution:1. Environment and Life Cycle Engineering Division, Scientific and Technical Centre for Buildings (CSTB), University Paris-East, 24, Rue Joseph Fourier, 38400, Saint Martin d’Hères, France
2. Department Life Cycle Engineering, Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics, Stuttgart, Germany
3. PE International, Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany
4. UNESCO Chair in Life Cycle and Climate Change (ESCI-UPF), Barcelona, Spain
5. BRE Global Ltd., Watford, UK
6. Prof Ch Sj?str?m Consultancy, G?vle, Sweden
Abstract:

Purpose

The objective of the paper is to discuss the role of a new guidance document for life cycle assessment (LCA) in the construction sector available as an online InfoHub.

Methods

This InfoHub derives from the EeBGuide European project that aimed at developing a guidance document for energy-efficient building LCA studies. The InfoHub is built on reference documents such as the ISO 14040-44 standards, the EN 15804 and EN 15978 standards as well as the ILCD Handbook. The guidance document was filled with expertise and knowledge of several experts. The focus was put on providing scientifically sound, yet practical guidance.

Results

The EeBGuide InfoHub is an online guidance document, setting rules for conducting LCA studies and giving instructions on how to do this. The document has a section on buildings—new and existing—and a section on construction products. It is structured according to the life cycle stages of the European standards EN 15804 and EN 15978, covering all aspects of LCA studies by applying provisions from these standards and the ILCD handbook, wherever applicable. The guidance is presented for different scopes of studies by means of three study types. For the same system boundaries, default values are proposed in early or quick assessment (screening and simplified LCA) while detailed calculation rules correspond to a complete LCA. Such approach is intended to better match the user needs in the building sector.

Conclusions and recommendations

This paper can be viewed as a contribution to the ongoing efforts to improve the consistency and harmonisation in LCA studies for building products and buildings. Further contributions are now needed to improve building LCA guidance and to strengthen links between research, standardisation and implementation of LCA in the construction practice.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号