A framework for assessing ecological quality based on ecosystem services |
| |
Authors: | Achim Paetzold Philip H. Warren Lorraine L. Maltby |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Catchment Science Centre, The University of Sheffield, Broad Lane, Sheffield S3 7HQ, UK;2. Department of Animal and Plant Science, The University of Sheffield, Western Bank Sheffield S10 2TN, UK;1. Institute of Environmental Science and Technology (ICTA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Edifici Z, Carrer de les Columnes, Campus de la UAB, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain;2. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoser Straße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany;3. Humboldt University of Berlin, Department of Geography, Lab for Landscape Ecology, Rudower Chaussee 16, 12489 Berlin, Germany;4. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Gaustadalléen 21, 0349 Oslo, Norway;5. Dutch Research Institute for Transitions (DRIFT), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands;1. Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Ecosystem Services Research Group, Jägerstr. 22/23, 10117 Berlin, Germany;2. Chair for Landscape Management, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Straße 4, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;1. School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China;2. Key Laboratory of Digital Mapping and Land Information Application Engineering, National Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China;3. School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China;4. Key Laboratory of Geographical Information Science, Ministry of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China;1. School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, 163 Xianlin Avenue, Qixia Distinct, Nanjing, 210023, China;2. Key Laboratory of Coastal Zone Exploitation and Protection, Ministry of Land and Resources, 163 Xianlin Avenue, Qixia Distinct, Nanjing, 210023, China;3. Satellite Environment Centre, Ministry of Environmental Protection, No. 4 Fengde East Road, Yongfeng Industrial Base, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing, 100094, China;4. Key Laboratory for Satellite Mapping Technology and Applications of State Administration of Surveying, Mapping, and of China, Nanjing University, 163 Xianlin Avenue, Qixia Distinct, Nanjing, 210023, China;5. School of Public Administration, Nanjing University of Finance & Economics, Wenyuan Road, Qixia Distinct, Nanjing, 210023, China |
| |
Abstract: | Existing environmental legislation and ecological quality definitions such as ecosystem integrity tend to rely on measures that, either implicitly or explicitly, utilize naturalness as a key criterion. There are marked practical difficulties with employing the concept of naturalness in human dominated landscapes, and the management of such ecosystems is inevitably going to need to take account of human needs and expectations. We propose that ecological quality could be assessed by its ecosystem service profile (ESP): the overlap between societal expectations for, and the sustainable provision of, suites of ecosystem services. The status for each individual ecosystem service is defined by the ratio of its sustained provision to the expected level of provision for the service. The ESP measure is a multi-criterion, context-specific assessment of the match between expectation for and sustainable supply of ecosystem services. It provides a flexible measure of quality which takes into account that the “ideal” ecosystem state is largely dependent on the specific management context. The implementation of ESPs challenges us to develop indicators for the sustained provision of individual ecosystem services, much better understanding of the trade-offs among services, and practical tools for gauging societal demands. All of which are challenging problems. The proposed framework can help to strategically address research needs and monitoring requirements and foster a more integrative approach to ecosystem assessment and management in the future. The need for this follows from the fact that the undisturbed reference state represents only one aspect of an ecosystem and that ecological quality in human dominated landscapes will, ultimately, be determined by the value society places on the sustainable provision of multiple ecosystem services. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|