Flock feeding and food intake in Little Egrets Egretta garzetta and their effects on food provisioning and reproductive success

Food provisioning to chicks of Little Egret Egretta garzetta in a colony at Ligagneau in the Camargue, southern France, was measured using electronic nest balances. Both pair members supplied food to the chicks, and each performed three to five alternating foraging trips. The loading rate during the first trip of the day (1.09 g/min) was more than three times as high as that during later trips (0.32 g/min) and accounted for 20% of the daily amount of food delivered. This food was collected while the birds were feeding in dense aggregations on mosquitofish which had become temporarily concentrated due to hypoxic conditions overnight in the surrounding marsh. Later in the day, when this concentrated food source was no longer available, the birds fed solitarily. The total amount of food delivered per day remained constant at 385 g as chick age increased from 10 to 20 days. Given the observed loading rates, 385 g is near the maximum amount of food the pair can deliver during a 16.5-h daylight period when they forage continuously throughout the day but only one parent at a time. This indicates that a time constraint limits the amount of food delivered to a brood during this stage of the breeding cycle. Given this time constraint, the total amount of food delivered per day would have been reduced by 25% if the birds had not been able to benefit from the concentrations of mosquitofish during the early morning. Breeding success was significantly higher at Ligagneau (3.25 chicks/nest) than in other Camargue colonies (2.69 chicks/nest). In addition, post-fledging survival of chicks with a low rank in the brood hierarchy was probably better at Ligagneau than elsewhere in the Camargue. We attribute this elevated reproductive output at Ligagneau to the exceptionally large amount of food collected by egrets during the early morning aggregations, which were probably formed in response to predictable concentrations of mosquitofish in the permanent marshes surrounding this colony. Such aggregations were rarely observed in the temporary marshes surrounding the other colonies, probably because the occurrence and location of fish concentrations are difficult to predict in this habitat due to rapidly falling water levels.