| Abstract: | The literature concerning regret among women following voluntary sterilization shows a lack of methodological rigor. This paper reviews the 7 prospective studies of voluntary sterilization conducted since 1973 that are judged to have adequate design and measurement standards, and suggests methodological considerations for future research. 3 of the studies were conducted in the US, 2 in the UK, 1 in Thailand, and 1 in Pakistan. Only 3 of the 7 studies used control groups and only 3 used standardized pre- and posttest psychological measures. Subjects in all the studies requested sterilization on a voluntary basis. 4 of the 7 studies evaluated contraceptive and menstrual histories before and after sterilization. All the studies varied in their poststerilization follow-up intervals ranging from 2 months and 1 year to 18 months and 2 years. Attrition rates also varied widely across the studies. Although none of these studies presented percentages for precise measures of regret, the overall effect of the sterilization procedure was found to be positive. The relationship between regret and purported indicators of regret, such as depression, anxiety, menstrual difficulties, and desire for reversal, should be documented in prospective, controlled studies. Longer poststerilization follow-up periods are recommended. Responses of childless women and male partners to sterilization should also be considered in future studies. Finally, since repeated references are made to menstrual problems following voluntary sterilization, it is important that studies assessing poststerilization responses control for oral contraceptive (OC) use because OCs reduce menstrual flow and their discontinuation results in a return to normal, although heavier, menstrual flow. |
