The evolution of cranial design, diet, and feeding mechanisms in batoid fishes |
| |
Authors: | Dean Mason N Bizzarro Joseph J Summers Adam P |
| |
Affiliation: | *Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, 321 Steinhaus Hall, Irvine CA 92697-2525, USA Pacific Shark Research Center, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, 8272 Moss Landing Road, Moss Landing, CA 95039, USA |
| |
Abstract: | The batoid fishes (electric rays, sawfishes, skates, guitarfishes,and stingrays) are a trophically and morphologically diverseclade in which the observed range of diets is a product of afeeding mechanism with few parts and therefore a limited numberof functional interactions. This system allows an intriguingcomparison to the complex network of associations in the feedingapparatus of bony fishes and an anatomically simple frameworkfor investigations of the mechanisms underlying the evolutionof functional and phenotypic diversity. We quantified morphologyfrom reconstructed CT scans of 40 batoid species, representingmore than half of the extant genera. We used pairwise comparisonsto evaluate the extent of coevolution among components of thefeeding apparatus and among morphologies and diets. These relationshipswere then used to predict diets in poorly studied taxa and ina reconstruction of the batoid ancestor. Although functionallythere are fewer examples of convergence in the batoid feedingmechanism than in bony fishes, our data show multiple evolutionsof similar dietary compositions underlain by a broad morphologicaldiversity. Elements of the feeding apparatus evolved independentlyof one another, suggesting that decoupling components of thehead skeleton created separate but interacting evolutionarymodules that allowed trophic diversification. Our data implythat food habits exhibit strong independent and convergent evolutionand that suites of morphologies are associated with certaindiets; however, lack of behavioral data for this clade, andone example of divergent diets underlain by convergent morphology,caution against the assumption of simplistic relationships betweenform and function. We therefore urge future work to ground truthour study by testing the functional, dietary and evolutionaryhypotheses suggested by our data. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed Oxford 等数据库收录! |
|