Meiofaunal colonization of azoic estuarine sediment in Louisiana: Mechanisms of dispersal1

Two mechanisms of muddy-bottom meiofaunal dispersal, waterborne suspended transport and holobenthic infaunal immigration, were compared as to their rate and effectiveness in mediating community reestablishment after small-scale defaunation. Colonizing meiofauna were quantitatively sampled in winter and summer from 16 replicates of two azoic sediment chamber designs on 2 and 29 days postplacement. The chambers were ≈ 3750 cm³; one design allowed colonization via suspended movement through an open top, while the other design permitted entry only by infaunal crawling through subsurface open sides. After 48 h, mean harpacticoid copepod and naupliar densities in sediment chambers open to colonization exclusively by meiofauna in suspended transport were not significantly different from background sediment densities. Sediment chambers allowing colonization exclusively via infaunal immigration through the sediment, however, contained copepod and naupliar densities that were significantly less than densities in background sediments and suspension-colonized chambers. In contrast, nematode densities in both suspension- and infaunally colonized chambers were significantly less than in background sediments, but densities were not significantly different between the chamber treatments. Thus for a small-scale defaunation, copepods most rapidly and completely recolonize sediments via suspended transport. Nematode dispersal occurs equally well via suspended or infaunal movement; however nematodes never seemed to utilize the chambers fully because densities did not reach background levels even after 29 days.