Effect of prolonged administration of small doses of LH-RH and LH-RH analogue [D-Ser (But)6] Des Gly-NH210 ethylamide on the release of LH and induction of ovulation in mid-anoestrous ewes

A natural process of LH release and induction of ovulation in anoestrous ewes was simulated by prolonged administration of small doses of LH-RH and its analogue [D-Ser(But)⁶] Des Gly-NH₂¹⁰ ethylamide. In the first series of experiments on 40 Merino ewes infusions of LH-RH were made into the maxillaris interna artery for 6 consecutive days for 6 h each day. Total doses of 24.0, 26.0, 28.0 and 32.0 μg per animal of varying and progressively increasing daily quantities of the hormone were administered in groups I, II, III and IV, respectively. In group V the animals were infused with a total dose of 28.0 μg LH-RH and injected additionally i.m. with 3.0 μg 17β-oestradiol on days 4 and 5 of the infusion of LH-RH. Ovulation did not occur earlier than days 4, 5 and 6 after the beginning of infusions. The highest number of positive reactions occurred in group IV ($\text{8}\text{10}$) and in group V ($\text{7}\text{8}$ animals). The pattern of LH peaks in general was correlated with the time of ovulations. The LH concentrations of the preovulatory peaks in experimental ewes were mostly lower than those in naturally ovulating animals. The corpora lutea were functional during the first 7 days after ovulation.In the second series of experiments on 26 Merino ewes the LH-RH analogue [D-Ser -(But)⁶] Des Gly-NH₂¹⁰ ethylamide was injected i.m. or i.a. for 6 consecutive days. Total doses of 15.5, 9.5 and 7.5 μg of the analogue per animal, administered at varying and progressively increasing daily doses in respective groups, induced several surges of LH in the same individuals for 2 or even 3 consecutive days. Corpora lutea and degenerating follicles in the form of cysts were found in the ovaries of animals of these groups. Very small daily doses ranging from 0.1 μg administered during the first 3 days, to 1.5 μg on day 5 of the treatment, released one surge of LH on day 5 of the treatment in all individuals with peaks ranging from 30.0 to 58.0 ng/ml and induction of ovulation with almost normal luteal function. On the basis of these experiments it is suggested that the evaluation of the effect of active substance (LH-RH or its analogue), its suitability and application of rightly chosen doses to induce the full physiological process of ovulation should be based not only on the release of LH and luteal function but also on tests of the ability of the released ovum to undergo fertilization and its further development.