首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


The Case for Intervention Bias in the Practice of Medicine
Authors:Andrew J. Foy  Edward J. Filippone
Affiliation:aFellow in Cardiology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania;bClinical Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Abstract:Bias is an inclination to present or hold a partial perspective at the expense ofpossibly equal or more valid alternatives. In this paper, we present a series ofconditional arguments to prove that intervention bias exists in the practice ofmedicine. We then explore its potential causes, consequences, and criticisms. Weuse the term to describe the bias on the part of physicians and the medicalcommunity to intervene, whether it is with drugs, diagnostic tests, non-invasiveprocedures, or surgeries, when not intervening would be a reasonablealternative. The recognition of intervention bias in medicine is criticallyimportant given today’s emphasis on providing high-value care and reducingunnecessary and potentially harmful interventions.
Keywords:evidence-based medicine   contradicted findings   medical reversal   bias   overtreatment   positive-outcome bias   observational studies   basic science   randomized controlled trials
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号