Implications of fossil conifers for the phylogenetic relationships of living families |
| |
Authors: | Charles N Miller |
| |
Institution: | (1) Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 59812 Missoula, Montana |
| |
Abstract: | Fossils have played a central role in our understanding of the evolution of conifers. Interpretation of the seed cone as a
compound strobilus and the homologies of the ovuliferous scales of modern conifers with the axillary dwarf shoot of Pennsylvanian
forms are based on fossils. Similarly, early evolutionary trends involving the reduction, fusion, and planation of the fertile
and sterile elements of the axillary dwarf shoot, leading to structures characteristic of modern families, are documented
in Late Permian and Triassic conifers. However, a phylogeny elucidating the derivation of modern families from fossil forms
based on shared derived features has been elusive.
The present cladistic treatment using 11 characters of ovulate cones and one of pollen grains suggests three phylogenetic
groups of Late Paleozoic conifers, represented loosely by the Emporicaceae, Utrechtiaceae, and Majonicaceae of Mapes and Rothwell.
The Taxaceae appears to have diverged from ancestors within the Utrechtiaceae, whereas the other modern families owe their
origins to the Majonicaceae. The origin of the Taxodiaceae appears to have been biphyletic.Taxodium, Cupressus andSciadopitys are strongly linked toDolmitia of the Majonicaceae, butCryptomeria, Cunninghamia andAraucaria are grouped together and diverge basal to the former taxa.Pinus branches from a position basal to the known genera of the Majonicaceae and all modern families except the Taxaceae.Podocarpus also diverges basal toMajonica but may share an ancestor with this genus;Cepahalotaxus diverges basal to theDolmitiaPseudovoltzia subclade but distal toMajonica. Similarly, the Cheirolepidiaceae originated from basal members of the Majonicaceae and shows no close phylogenetic relationship
with any modern family. Except for a strong linkage betweenCycadocarpidium and theAraucariaCunninghamia subclade, genera of the Voltziaceae appear to have branched more or less independently from within the Majonicaceae and show
no strong affinity with modern conifers. Thus differences between modern conifer families are due mainly to their divergence
from different Paleozoic ancestors. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|