Unusual allometry between in situ growth of freshwater phytoplankton under static and fluctuating light environments: possible implications for dominance

The effects of fluctuating light fields on the growth of phytoplanktonare not well understood and conclusions in the literature havebeen equivocal. Most studies have examined responses such asproductivity and chlorophyll a content (laboratory culture andfield tests) or growth rates (laboratory culture tests). Inthis study we examined the in situ growth rates of differenttypes of phytoplankton within two natural populations. Comparisonswere made between populations grown in a static environment(suspended in a fixed position in the water column) and an equivalentpopulation moving through the water column simulating the mixingof entrained phytoplankton. Growth under fluctuating light fieldsin this experiment only significantly (P < 0.05) increasedthe growth of the diatom Skeletonema and decreased the growthof Anabaena circinalis, Microcystis aeruginosa and Scenedesmussp. All other phytoplankton, including the genera Nitzschia,Fragilaria and Dactylococcopsis, did not have growth rates thatwere significantly different between static and fluctuatinglight treatments. A general pattern where diatoms grew best,followed by chlorophytes with the toxicogenic cyanophytes M.aeruginosa and A. circinalis growing least well, was distinguishedunder fluctuating irradiance. This seems consistent with thecommon occurrence of these groups of phytoplankton in the naturalenvironment. The cyanophytes Dactylococcopsis and Aphanothecedid not follow this pattern, with the former growing betterunder fluctuating light and the latter exhibiting an unusualgrowth pattern where growth was higher under lower light intensities.