Thioredoxin m4 Controls Photosynthetic Alternative Electron Pathways in Arabidopsis

In addition to the linear electron flow, a cyclic electron flow (CEF) around photosystem I occurs in chloroplasts. In CEF, electrons flow back from the donor site of photosystem I to the plastoquinone pool via two main routes: one that involves the Proton Gradient Regulation5 (PGR5)/PGRL1 complex (PGR) and one that is dependent of the NADH dehydrogenase-like complex. While the importance of CEF in photosynthesis and photoprotection has been clearly established, little is known about its regulation. We worked on the assumption of a redox regulation and surveyed the putative role of chloroplastic thioredoxins (TRX). Using Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants lacking different TRX isoforms, we demonstrated in vivo that TRXm4 specifically plays a role in the down-regulation of the NADH dehydrogenase-like complex-dependent plastoquinone reduction pathway. This result was confirmed in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants overexpressing the TRXm4 orthologous gene. In vitro assays performed with isolated chloroplasts and purified TRXm4 indicated that TRXm4 negatively controls the PGR pathway as well. The physiological significance of this regulation was investigated under steady-state photosynthesis and in the pgr5 mutant background. Lack of TRXm4 reversed the growth phenotype of the pgr5 mutant, but it did not compensate for the impaired photosynthesis and photoinhibition sensitivity. This suggests that the physiological role of TRXm4 occurs in vivo via a mechanism distinct from direct up-regulation of CEF.In plant thylakoids, photosynthesis involves a linear electron flow (LEF) from water to NADP⁺ via PSII, cytochrome b₆/f, PSI, and soluble carriers. LEF produces NADPH and generates a transthylakoidal electrochemical proton gradient that drives the synthesis of ATP. Besides LEF, cyclic electron flow (CEF) can also occur, involving only PSI (for review, see Johnson, 2011; Kramer and Evans, 2011). These additional reactions include two main distinct pathways involving either the Proton Gradient Regulation5 (PGR5)/PGRL1 complex (Munekage et al., 2002; DalCorso et al., 2008) or the NADH dehydrogenase-like complex (NDH; for review, see Battchikova et al., 2011; Ifuku et al., 2011). The functioning of either CEF pathway, which generates a pH gradient ΔpH without any accumulation of NADPH, is thought to achieve the appropriate ATP/NADPH balance required for the biochemical needs of the plant, especially under certain environmental conditions such as low CO₂ (Golding and Johnson, 2003), heat (Clarke and Johnson, 2001), cold (Clarke and Johnson, 2001), drought (Golding and Johnson, 2003; Kohzuma et al., 2009), high light (Munekage et al., 2004), or dark-to-light transitions (Joliot and Joliot, 2005; Fan et al., 2007). CEF-generated ΔpH is also involved in photoprotection owing to the down-regulation of PSII via nonphotochemical quenching (Munekage et al., 2004; Takahashi et al., 2009). Very recently, the role of the PGR5 protein as a regulator of LEF has been established. It has proved to be essential in the protection of PSI from photodamage (Suorsa et al., 2012).The two cyclic pathways are redundant (Munekage et al., 2004), sharing ferredoxin (Fd) as a common stromal electron donor (Yamamoto et al., 2011) and electron carriers from plastoquinone (PQ) to PSI with LEF. Thus, LEF and either of the CEF pathways may be in competition. The molecular events that allow CEF to challenge LEF remain enigmatic, particularly when considering that the conditions that require CEF are also those under which LEF is in excess. Efforts to understand the appropriate functioning of CEF have led to the proposition of several models segregating cyclic and linear pathways at a structural level (for review, see Eberhard et al., 2008; Cardol et al., 2011; Johnson, 2011; Rochaix, 2011). According to the restricted diffusion model, founded on the uneven distribution of the photosynthetic protein complexes in the thylakoids, there is little competition between CEF and LEF, as CEF occurs in stroma lamellae where PSI is concentrated while LEF takes place in the grana stacks. In line with the supercomplex model, whose relevance was demonstrated in the microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, CEF happens within tightly bound supercomplexes containing PSI, with its own light-harvesting complex (LHCI), the PSII light-harvesting complex (LHCII), cytochrome b₆/f, Fd, Fd NADP reductase (FNR), and the integral membrane protein PGRL1 (Iwai et al., 2010). In higher plants, an association between NDH and PSI subunits suggests the formation of such supercomplexes (Peng et al., 2009). The availability of FNR, found either free in the stroma or bound to the thylakoids (Zhang et al., 2001), has also been proposed to modulate partitioning between LEF and CEF (Joliot and Joliot, 2006; Joliot and Johnson, 2011). In addition, more dynamic models that illustrate competitive processes involved in the distribution of electrons between the cyclic and linear flows have been proposed. The competition between cytochrome b₆/f and FNR for electrons from Fd could regulate the segregation between LEF and CEF (Breyton et al., 2006; Yamamoto et al., 2006; Hald et al., 2008). A few years ago, Joliot and Joliot (2006) suggested that the ATP/ADP ratio was one of the parameters that triggered on the transition between LEF and CEF. It was also established that the redox poise of chloroplast stroma contributed to the regulation of the photosynthetic pathway and played an important role in defining the extent of CEF. Breyton et al. (2006) scrutinized this redox regulation and established that the fraction of PSI complexes engaged in CEF could be modulated by changes in the stromal redox state. Overreduction of the NADPH pool was involved in the repartition between LEF and CEF (Joliot and Joliot, 2006). The NADPH/NADP⁺ ratio was proposed as a regulator of PGR-dependent CEF in vivo (Okegawa et al., 2008).All the published data supporting a role for the redox status in the regulation of CEF urged us to investigate a putative role of thioredoxins (TRX) in the regulation of CEF. TRX are ubiquitous disulfide reductases regulating the redox status of target proteins (for review, see Lemaire et al., 2007; Meyer et al., 2009). In chloroplast, TRX mediate the light regulation of numerous enzymes, among which some belong to the Calvin cycle (for review, see Schürmann and Buchanan, 2008; Montrichard et al., 2009; Lindahl et al., 2011). Global proteomic approaches have revealed that well-known photosynthetic complex subunits may be partners of TRX, such as PsbO in PSII, plastocyanin, Rieske Fe-S protein in cytochrome b₆/f, and PsaK and PsaN in PSI (for review, see Montrichard et al., 2009; Lindahl et al., 2011). Furthermore, regarding the regulation of photosynthesis, TRX have also been involved in state transitions (Rintamäki et al., 2000; Buchanan and Balmer, 2005), and their participation in the control of the redox poise of the electron transport chain has also been suggested (Johnson, 2003).In this work, we have investigated the possible role of TRX in the regulation of CEF. Using Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants with altered expression of genes encoding different plastid TRX, we have established in vivo the inhibitor activity of TRXm4 on the NDH-dependent pathway for plastoquinone reduction. This result was confirmed in transplastomic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants overexpressing the TRXm4 orthologous gene. Moreover, in vitro assays performed with isolated chloroplasts indicated that TRXm4 negatively controls the PGR-dependent electron flow as well.