Cometabolic Degradation of Trichloroethene by Rhodococcus sp. Strain L4 Immobilized on Plant Materials Rich in Essential Oils

The cometabolic degradation of trichloroethene (TCE) by Rhodococcus sp. L4 was limited by the loss of enzyme activity during TCE transformation. This problem was overcome by repeated addition of inducing substrates, such as cumene, limonene, or cumin aldehyde, to the cells. Alternatively, Rhodococcus sp. L4 was immobilized on plant materials which contain those inducers in their essential oils. Cumin seeds were the most suitable immobilizing material, and the immobilized cells tolerated up to 68 μM TCE and degraded TCE continuously. The activity of immobilized cells, which had been inactivated partially during TCE degradation, could be reactivated by incubation in mineral salts medium without TCE. These findings demonstrate that immobilization of Rhodococcus sp. L4 on plant materials rich in essential oils is a promising method for efficient cometabolic degradation of TCE.Various bacteria have been reported to degrade trichloroethene (TCE) aerobically via cometabolic degradation with broad-substrate-specificity enzymes (2). However, TCE cometabolic degradation is considered an unsustainable process due to cytotoxicity, inhibition, or inactivation of TCE-degrading enzymes. These phenomena have been observed in studies using both whole cells and purified enzymes, including soluble methane monooxygenases from Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b (9) and Nitrosomonas europaea (13), toluene 2-monooxygenase from Burkholderia cepacia G4 (19, 27), toluene dioxygenase (TDO) from Pseudomonas putida F1 (15, 18), and butane-oxidizing bacteria, i.e., Pseudomonas butanovora, Mycobacterium vaccae, and Nocardioides sp. CF8 (11). Nevertheless, the addition of an inducer or growth substrate can maintain TCE cometabolic degradation. For example, the TCE-degrading activity of P. putida F1 toluene dioxygenase was restored after adding benzene, cumene, or toluene to displace TCE and its reactive intermediates from the enzyme active site (18). Arp et al. (2) suggested that the rate of enzyme maintenance and recovery depended on the extent of inactivation and the balance of TCE and inducer/growth substrate concentrations.Plant essential oils and their components, such as citral, limonene, cumene, and cumin aldehyde, have been found to induce TCE degradation in Rhodococcus sp. L4 (24). However, the removal of TCE by this bacterium was effective only for a short period. The impacts of TCE on Rhodococcus spp. and their enzymes have not been studied in detail, even though many bacteria of this genus exhibited high TCE-degrading activities (i.e., Rhodococcus erythropolis JE 77, R. erythropolis BD2, Rhodococcus sp. Sm-1, and Rhodococcus sp. Wrink) (5, 6, 7, 16). This study therefore investigated the changes in TCE-degrading activity of Rhodococcus sp. L4 cells and TDO during exposure to TCE. Two enzyme maintenance approaches were evaluated, namely, repeated addition of essential oil components to the system and immobilization of the bacterial cells on plant material rich in essential oils. Immobilized microorganisms are generally capable of degrading pollutants at a higher initial concentration and for a longer period than those of free cells (21, 23), possibly because the microbial cells are protected from environmental stress and toxic compounds (3). In this study, the plant materials were used to provide a solid surface for bacterial attachment and a continuous source of essential oils for inducing TCE-degrading enzymes. Our results show that the repeated addition of limonene, cumene, or cumin aldehyde enhances TCE degradation and that bacteria immobilized on cumin seeds are able to maintain their TCE-degrading activity.